Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fledermaus
It was very bad.

How bad was it. What was the death rate.

If you want to see it, it’s here. See page 16 of this report to see how New York and Brooklyn (two separate cities then) stack up against other countries. They actually were much better than the “more advanced” Europeans. So in actuality, it would be bad today but for that time, it wasn’t that bad at all. The biggest change since then has been the ability to keep young children healthy. As anyone who has ever walked through an old cemetery knows, those places are full kids who died of childhood diseases that we don’t even think of today.

45 posted on 04/11/2025 5:28:27 PM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto

I said WAS. Can’t be compared to today.

We have an old family cemetery full of dead kids months apart in Ark.

I’d imagine the filfh in the cities was worse given the number of people in small areas.

Yuck.

Bottom line is it wasn’t sunshine and roses. Comparison is frankly useless and silly IMO.


46 posted on 04/11/2025 8:17:08 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson