Most of those 19 states were all Kamala Harris states. While the States do have the Constitutional authority to Regulate voting, there are requirements for Federal Voters and Federal Elections, that must be met. Those basic requirements must be ensured to all Americans.
Clearly, the DOGE has proven that illegal immigrants were granted Social Security numbers illegally by the last Administration. Further, we know that these numbers were used for them to Vote in many states. The Civil rights issue of our day isn't if you can vote, but will your vote matter or will voting irregularities (registering and allowing ineligible voters) drown out your vote in a sea of fraud.
To: Pete Dovgan
Those states brought all this upon themselves for failing to root out elections corruption and cheating.
2 posted on
04/08/2025 10:00:34 AM PDT by
ViLaLuz
(2 Chronicles 7:14)
To: Pete Dovgan
Most of those 19 states were all Kamala Harris states. While the States do have the Constitutional authority to Regulate voting, there are requirements for Federal Voters and Federal Elections, that must be met. Those basic requirements must be ensured to all Americans.
It is clearly written in the Constitution that Congress has the right to set the standards for Federal Elections.
President Trump's EO deals specifically with Federal Elections.
This lawsuit is D.O.A.
3 posted on
04/08/2025 10:09:32 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Trump has all the right enemies, DeSantis has all the wrong friends.)
To: Pete Dovgan
State vs Federal elections. BIG difference.
4 posted on
04/08/2025 10:10:45 AM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Pete Dovgan
This would seem to be a very desperate move. A court precedent on this would be disastrous to the Democrats.
5 posted on
04/08/2025 10:21:29 AM PDT by
dangus
To: Pete Dovgan
It's hard to find a clear explanation of exactly what this order does. The states do have a point -- even if the federal government does have a role in elections, that normally would come from Congress. An Executive Order is limited in what it can accomplish because an Executive Order is just an order to federal employees. An EO can't actually order state governments or state government employees to do anything.
To: Pete Dovgan
Look no further than the Wis-con-sin election last week ... It is remarkable how so many of the highly vaunted Catholics cheat in elections!!! John Flippin Kennedy and Joey godfather both stole their way into the WhiteHouse ...
OH just for the Catholic whiners, that believe they are above reproach, deal with the reality ...
I know somebody that graduated from Notre Dame and they have NO problem in the assistance of stealing elections ...
Look at the Supremes ... majority of are Catholics ...
10 posted on
04/08/2025 10:53:50 AM PDT by
Just mythoughts
(Psalm 2. Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?)
To: Pete Dovgan
11 posted on
04/08/2025 11:12:53 AM PDT by
dynachrome
(Auslander Raus!)
To: Pete Dovgan
The regulation of elections for Representative and Senator belongs to Congress.
The regulation of appointment of Electors belongs to State Legislatures.
The authority of the President over either is zero.
21 posted on
04/09/2025 8:08:54 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson