Only, it is NOT false hope.
But, you are entitled to YOUR opinion, as am I.
I’ve seen repeated cases of NED, after said treatments.
No...they aren’t ‘peer reviewed studies’ or BigPharma BigHospital systems (paid for by BigPharma) approved. Because they don’t make money. But, they are posted for all to see by doctors/alternative oncologists/Cancer Researchers, many of whom have authored 100s of said publications/cases.
But, you do you .. .
... and, now I am curious if you happen to work for BigPharma or are an oncologist. You are staunchly attached to their practices, I see. And, no, I know for a fact many conventional oncologists do not make the nutritional recommendations I mentioned, previously.
Continued success with your own experience.
Good day to you, Lou.
In other words, you have anecdotes, not data. Nothing that can be re-produced, no data generated that supports efficacy, nothing that a doctor could point to in support of a decision, nothing a patient could be hopeful about in terms of a treatment.
There is a saying, "the plural of anecdote is NOT data." You have a few anecdotes that likely wouldn't hold up to any scrutiny. By all means, you cling tightly to that.
And one more thing--I do work in the pharmaceutical industry and have for 30 years. I've learned a lot about the scientific approach to medicine, and unfortunately, I've seen a lot of it corrupted by politics on both sides of political spectrum. Am I biased? I don't think so, nor should I be disqualified for having an opinion that's different than yours (and a great many, here on this forum.)