Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va

The participation rate has definitely been in decline.

There is no evidence that the cause of this is a lack of manufacturing jobs.

Rather, he official definition of workforce age is 16 and older. There is no top end (oddly). So obviously the baby boom in retirement age will shrink participation rate per the graphs and this has been known for some time. Big numbers retire.

Then there is health. US consumption of pain opioids by working age people has exploded. One half of working age men take pain medication, and 2/3 of that total are on prescription pain medication. That shrinks the available pool of men of that age to work in factories.

And so. There is no pool of non tax paying people poised to jump into these factory jobs and pay tax revenue.


97 posted on 04/06/2025 9:37:26 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Owen
And so. There is no pool of non tax paying people poised to jump into these factory jobs and pay tax revenue.

Says who? A cretin like you?

98 posted on 04/06/2025 9:38:28 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: Owen
Question:

Stagnant wages and a low birth rate are signs of:

  1. A tight labor pool
  2. An oversupply of labor
  3. The perfect amount of labor vs jobs available

100 posted on 04/06/2025 9:40:42 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson