Tucker Carlson Horrified as Dr. Mary Talley Bowden Drops Chilling COVID Statistic [C19 'vaccine']

THe CDC is distributing Emergency Use Authorized versions of all Covid19 'vaccines' when licensed versions are available. The Covid 'emergency' was terminated in 2023, so I assumed the EUA's expired on all Covid 'vaccines' because part of the requirement for an EUA is the existance of an emergency. But the Deep STaters in HHS in 2023 amended the rules so that just the 'potential' for an emergency to exist allows them to extend the Emergency Use Authorization on Covid 'vaccines'.
The only known reason for this bait-and-switch is that licensed versions entail liability and EUA versions do not.
In 2020:
On February 4, 2020, the Secretary determined pursuant to his authority under section 564 of the FD&C Act that there is a public health emergency that has a significant potential to affect national security...
In 2023 amendment:
On March 15, 2023, the Secretary amended the February 4, 2020 determination made pursuant to section 564 of the FD&C Act and determined pursuant to his authority under section 564(b)(1)(C) that there is a public health emergency, or a significant potential for a public health emergency,
Their excuses and rationalizations for distributing EUA 'vaccines' after the Covid 'emergency' was terminated in 2023 is on the following page:
https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/faqs-what-happens-euas-when-public-health-emergency-ends
ransomnote: Several treatments for COvid are still under EUA.
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/emergency-preparedness-drugs/emergency-use-authorizations-drugs-and-non-vaccine-biological-products
All Covid 'vaccines' currently administered are liability free EUA versions:
August 22, 2024: FDA approves and authorizes updated mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to better protect against currently circulating variants.
August 30, 2024: FDA authorizes updated Novavax COVID-19 vaccine to better protect against currently circulating variants.
I wonder if any other 'vaccines' might be EUA versions without the public knowing? The CDC is trying to stampede the public into MMR and Bird Flu 'vaccinations' - are they licensed versions of the vax or 'new' mRNA versions of the vax?
It's very tricky to find out because the CDC (and trolls) try to confuse people with 'authorized' (EUA) when the topic is 'licensed'. The following sleight of hand wording makes me think the MMR 'vaccines' may not be 'licensed', but only 'authorized'.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/vaccines/mmr.html
Here again:
On June 6, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration approved a second MMR vaccine, PRIORIX (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals), for the prevention of measles, mumps, and rubella in persons aged ≥12 months.
Available vaccines & manufacturer package inserts
The FDA approved M-M-R II in 1971 for use in people 12 months of age and older.
The FDA approved PRIORIX in 2022 for use in people 12 months of age and older.
Yet at another link, the text says the MMR is licensed. Which is it? Licensed or Approved? If the CDC wasn't deceiving the public on the COvid 'vaccine' (gene therapy) I wouldn't have such doubts.
I can say I would not take an MMR based on the links in the prior post below:
In the Bloggers & Personal forum, on a thread titled Texas Gave 15,000 More MMR Shots This Year - Now It Has More Measles Cases Than the Entire US Had In 2024, ransomnote wrote:
For additional articles about MMR, you may want to skim this for links of interest.
From my post elsewhere in the forum, more about the measles Vaccine.
~~~~
I can say MERCK likely had the most doses administered by far because they started earlier (invented in the 70's). But I took the time to look at disabled, deaths, life threatening injuries over time and in my opionion, given '50 deaths used to get a product pulled off market', Merck was allowed some leniency for quite some time. Sadly, this leniency sounds familiar (see links below) in that Merck seems to have been able to operate without interference although there were serious questions about how the claims of 'safe and effective' hold up to inspection.
Fresh on the heels of Covid19 vax pushing, the MSM is now fanning the flames of panic. The efficacy and safety of MMR is questioned quietly, not in the MSM.
Then THere's this:
Since the late 1990s, Merck has known that its measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine is significantly less effective than the company states on its product license and product insert.
Given that Merck’s own test results for the vaccine fell outside the specifications, or acceptance criteria established by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for drug applications, the production of this vaccine should have stopped, Merck should have suspended sales and the defective vaccine should have been withdrawn from the market with a product recall.
In April 2012, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, virologists working for Merck in Pennsylvania — who became whistleblowers — filed two separate lawsuits against the pharmaceutical giant alleging it falsified research data, enabling it to develop a monopoly on the MMR vaccine and block any competition.
Evidence provided in expert witness reports from Dr. David A. Kessler, ex-commissioner of the FDA, Dr. Robert Malone and Merck’s own internal documents described the vaccine as “misbranded,” “out of compliance” and “non-marketable.”
According to witnesses and legal counsel for the whistleblowers, Merck scientists resorted to “falsifying data and destroying unfavorable data.”
An ineffective mumps vaccine is dangerous. Recipients of the vaccine are not protected or become susceptible to mumps again at an older age, leading to outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations.
SNIP
In United States ex rel. Krahling v. Merck & Co., Krahling and Wlochowski have put compelling evidence of mumps vaccine fraud before the federal court in Philadelphia.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/philadelphia-3rd-circuit-merck-mmr-vaccine-fraud-case/
General concerns re MMR vaccines.
4/4/2019
MMR Vaccine’s Poison Pill: Mumps After Puberty, Reduced Testosterone and Sperm Counts
Across the country, frenzied legislators are responding to the pharmaceutical industry’s orchestrated fear campaign around measles by seeking to impose further mandating of Merck’s measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. Although ongoing mumps outbreaks involving thousands of at-risk adolescents and young adults completely dwarf the number of measles cases, no one is covering the mumps story—because it will expose the fact that Merck has been in court for over eight years due to scientists blowing the whistle on Merck’s fabrication and falsification of the effectiveness of the mumps component of its MMR vaccine.
7/27/2018
Failing MMR? Mumps Outbreaks in Vaccinated Population
Mumps outbreaks among vaccinated persons in university settings have increased. In 2016, large mumps outbreaks occurred at four Indiana universities. At some universities documentation of receipt of 2 doses of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) was not available and required substantial personnel time to verify. Implementation of policies for excluding susceptible persons from classes […]
4/12/2019
Shocking MMR Vaccine Trial Results Released Via FOIA
In the video, Del Bigtree explains the MMR preclinical trials.
3/7/2019
New Danish MMR Study Shows Autism Rate of 1 in 100—CDC Should Rush to Denmark!
COPENHAGEN, Denmark—We have another “Danish Study” that will invariably be all the talk. It’s too bad no one reads (or understands) the details about these studies that are both funded and researched by vaccine companies (this one is funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation and research completed by Danish vaccine maker Statens Serum Institut.)
1/14/2025
No Proof MMR Vaccine Is ‘Safer’ than Measles, Mumps or Rubella Infection, Physician Group Says
The risk of permanent disability or death from the MMR vaccine may be greater than the risk from a measles, mumps or rubella infection because large enough vaccine safety studies haven’t been done, according to a collection of new documents released by Physicians for Informed Consent.
~~~~
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/weeding-vaccine-toxins-mmr-glyphosate-health-generation/
Interestingly, of all the vaccines we tested, MMR stood out as consistently having the highest level of glyphosate contamination. This fact may help explain why the MMR vaccine, which contains neither mercury nor aluminum, has been implicated so often in vaccine injury and autism.
I'm skeptical now of vaccines post Fauci because he said all vaccines in the US going forward would be mRNA, and they won't tell us which, if any are based on mRNA.
I came across a 1978 insert for MERCK's MMR in case anyone wants to look at adverse events/contraindications
https://www.fda.gov/media/75191/download

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Tucker Carlson Horrified as Dr. Mary Talley Bowden Drops Chilling COVID Statistic [C19 'vaccine'], TexasGator wrote:
“Approved’ is not the same as ‘licensed’.”
Approval is granted after safety has been determined.
Licensing is for a unique name given to an already approved drug.
EUA can be given for either an unapproved OR approved drug.
On August 22, 2024, the Food and Drug Administration amended the emergency use authorization (EUA) of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to include the 2024-2025 formula.
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/coronavirus-covid-19-cber-regulated-biologics/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine
ransomnote: The licensed version of the Pfizer C19 gene therapy shot is Comirnaty. I've seen the paperwork on Comirnaty. But what the CDC did was extend the EUA for Pfizer's 'vaccine' instead of using the licensed version. The only reason to do that is to escape liability.
You performed the usual COvid shill sleight of hand in your post below, switching the conversation from 'authorized' as in EUA 'authorization' to 'approved'.

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Tucker Carlson Horrified as Dr. Mary Talley Bowden Drops Chilling COVID Statistic [C19 'vaccine'], TexasGator wrote:
ransomnote: “they put the Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) version of the ‘vaccine’ on the childhood schedule.”
TexasGator wrote: They are using fully approved formulas. Fully approved for 18 and older.
Released FOAI documentation has exposed the fact that the FDA/CDC/NIH had reason to know the Pfizer 'vaccine' in any state of authorization or approval is damaging to human heath.

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Tucker Carlson Horrified as Dr. Mary Talley Bowden Drops Chilling COVID Statistic [C19 'vaccine'], TexasGator wrote:
“But what the CDC did was extend the EUA for Pfizer’s ‘vaccine’ instead of using the licensed version. “
Duh. It is the same drug.
Comiraty is not licensed for the under 12
Supposedlyl the only difference between Comiraty and the EUA version is liability. To defeat those who were holding out for a version of the vax which was a) not declared experimental and b) entailed manufactuerers liability, Pfizer/FDA/CDC deceived the public by licensing a version of the 'vaccine' (Comiraty) which they never planned to produce. They went on offering the experimental version even while they talked about the licensed version. Some patients only found out later, when insurance company's denied their claims because they took an experimental vax. But all versions of the Covid 'vaccine' are toxic and should not be given.
In the 30 year history of the CDC's database for Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting, 49,393 deaths were reported after vaccination; 41,546 (84%) of those deaths were reported after a Covid 'vaccination'. That's just the tip of the iceberg - 1% of adverse events are reported after a vaccination, and the world-wide psyop pressured doctors/medical staff not to report adverse events for Covid 'vaccines'.
It's actually still worse - the CDC created a separate Database for Covid 'vaccines' (V-Safe) and that one is not available to the public; only the CDC staff can see it. Also, CMS (Medicare) whistle blowers were saying there were 40,000 deaths sitting in the CMS database that were never uploaded to VAERS.
The CDC was supposed to investigate deaths to see if they were actually caused by the vaccine received. Normally, 50 deaths were enough to get a product pulled from the market. Everything is ignored, excused or otherwise different for Covid gene therapy shots.
Monsters and ghouls push the vax on children, and hide the ill effects of the vax from the public.
From the 2/28/2025 release of VAERS data:
Found 49,393 cases where Patient Died. (84% of those deaths reported following Covid 'vaccination').
Vaccine/Manufacturer Count
TOTAL
COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH 25,956
COVID19 / MODERNA 12,651
COVID19 / JANSSEN 2,939
Total
41,546

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.