So a professional FBI shooter tested the weapon for accuracy.
A better test would be to have a minimally qualified shooter gain some experience with that exact same weapon at a shooting range.
Then with that same sighting adjustment error on the scope actually shoot at a moving target the size as JFK’s head moving the same speed and direction. The results could be much different than the FBI’s.
Other factors to considering is if Oswald was the shooter, did he lead the target when aiming or not? It appears the FBI assumed he did not.
A bigger factor many range shooters overlook is one’s emotional state at a shooting range when compared to the battlefield. The battle field creates nervous tension affecting aim. Oswald was not in a battlefield, but he was shooting at a President in front of numerous witnesses with minimal chances of escape. This would make most people just as nervous as with in a battlefield and throw the aim off considerably, unless he was a hardened experienced professional shooter.
There are so many ifs ands buts or maybes no one will ever know for sure, that’s why they had Oswald whacked so he could not tell his own story. He claimed he was a patsy, if he would have been allowed to live he could have explained that remark.
It’s sad on many levels that JFK was murdered. One such level was his successor was a very corrupt person that started the democrat party’s plunge into deeper socialism and eventually to the crooked communism of today. LBJ’s policies which include the Great Society, were racist in nature and designed to keep the rat party in power for years. And that was by his own admission.
There are many that would have welcomed JFK’s murder. They include LBJ, the CIA, the Mafia, the Cuban communists and the Soviet Union.
By today’s standards JFK would likely be considered a conservative democrat or a Republican. His death drastically changed the course of our nation for decades to come.
So would McGovern and Hubert Humphrey.