Submitted for your consideration.
House and Senate with a presidential signature. It would be normal legislation enacted through normal channels.
I agree.
Trials for Treason and sedition?
What the cabal wants more than anything is civil war leading to complete destruction of the United States.
Always the problem: by Congress
Rope, tree, traitor. Some assembly required.
What can this judge do if ignored?
I’ve been proposing this for a long time. No District Court judge should have any jurisdiction to hear any controversy in which the executive branch is a defendant. The Constitution provides that SCOTUS has Original Jurisdiction in these cases and the congress (stupidly) expanded that to lower courts. That can be undone. Simple majority of both houses and presidential signature.
Easiest beginning of a solution:
https://x.com/ChuckGrassley/status/1901792352785879519
“FEDERAL RULES require courts to collect financial guarantees frm ppl seeking 2halt exec orders bc wrongful restrictions cost taxpayers BILLION$ However activist judges cont 2issue nationwide injunctions without required bonds Trump admin is right to demand courts comply w law”
Question venue, too. Why is the DC court or SDNY ruling on cases that occur outside their jurisdiction?
The obvious solution is several decisive impeachments, which requires judges to incur attorney’s fees and puts them at personal risk.
Barring that, a good start would be legislation to limit the effect of any federal court to the geographic boundaries of the court’s venue. E.g. a court in the Southern District of New York has no jurisdiction and its orders are without effect outside the SDNY. Once a case is appealed to a circuit court of appeals, the same principle holds so that the appellate court’s decisions affect only those states in that circuit. The only court with authority to issue nationwide decisions would be SCOTUS. This doesn’t eliminate the problem, but it seriously limits the damage.
Another suggestion is for congress to de-fund federal courts who repeatedly facilitate lawfare or exceed their jurisdictional limitations. Just stop paying the electric bill and the rent.
I hate to say it, but the leftist judges are not always wrong when it comes to the Trump administration.
There’s always the nuclear option.
Deny funding to lower federal courts used in any way to process or handle specified types of cases. Couldn’t this be done in budget reconciliation? This avoids a Senate filibuster?
Oh, yeah! Because, otherwise there's nothing to keep the judges from getting the impression that they are free to remove or ignore part or parts of the U.S. Constitution they don't like or that forbid/interfere with some leftist dictatorial ruling they want to make.
/sarc
Whack A Mole Judges.
Use the gavel to respond.
Trump should just show each of these judges the file he has on them.
Redo of the Judiciary Act of 1802.
Restructure the jurisdictions to eliminate the whack job judges, expanding the jurisdictions of the good ones.
Has to go through the entire legislative process.
Do the Dems trick of attaching as a rider to “must pass” legislation. (This last CR would have been the perfect vehicle to do this)