A possible solution to Activist Judges

Original Content | 03/18/2025 | By Laz A. Mataz

[Lazamataz]

Submitted for your consideration.

[Publius]

House and Senate with a presidential signature. It would be normal legislation enacted through normal channels.

[Engraved-on-His-hands]

I agree.

[cowboyusa]

Trials for Treason and sedition?

[Lazamataz]

Well then.

We’re screwed.

And there is no president, just a bunch of leftwing judges.

[reasonisfaith]

What the cabal wants more than anything is civil war leading to complete destruction of the United States.

[madison10]

Always the problem: by Congress

[central_va]

Rope, tree, traitor. Some assembly required.

[lapsus calami]

 

 

The solution is quite clear. These judges are compromised either by domestic or foreign influences and should be treated as such. The lack of proper decorum and adherence to the law by their wild rulings makes it obvious. Ad hoc investigations have even tracked down connections they should not be part of. This is well beyond mickeying around with impeachments and SCOTUS oversight - unleash the power of the intelligence services on them and everyone around them in their circle, then start making arrests. That's the proper response to this weirdness.

 

 

[Mark]

What can this judge do if ignored?

[central_va]

How many infantry divisions does the Judicial branch have?

[P-Marlowe]

I’ve been proposing this for a long time. No District Court judge should have any jurisdiction to hear any controversy in which the executive branch is a defendant. The Constitution provides that SCOTUS has Original Jurisdiction in these cases and the congress (stupidly) expanded that to lower courts. That can be undone. Simple majority of both houses and presidential signature.

[jjotto]

Easiest beginning of a solution:

https://x.com/ChuckGrassley/status/1901792352785879519

“FEDERAL RULES require courts to collect financial guarantees frm ppl seeking 2halt exec orders bc wrongful restrictions cost taxpayers BILLION$ However activist judges cont 2issue nationwide injunctions without required bonds Trump admin is right to demand courts comply w law”

[Publius]

Not really screwed.

The proper procedure is via the impeachment process. Granted, the two thirds vote in the Senate is a showstopper, but those who defend violent alien gangs in order to keep misbehaving judges on the bench will be the center of really bad optics.

The key here is the impeachment inquiry in the House Judiciary Committee. The committee had the right to subpoena financial information and communications. The evidence gathered there might prompt the judge to resign and hold onto his pension rather than face an impeachment trial, wherein if convited he would lose it all.

[Lazamataz]

Simple majority of both houses and presidential signature.

Would not the filibuster prevent passage through the Senate?

[monkeyshine]

Question venue, too. Why is the DC court or SDNY ruling on cases that occur outside their jurisdiction?

[Publius]

Simple majority of both houses and presidential signature.

Don't ignore the possibility of a filibuster in the Senate.

[Publius]

Correct.

[Lazamataz]

Question venue, too. Why is the DC court or SDNY ruling on cases that occur outside their jurisdiction?

The reason, according to what I can see, is this:

Screw you.