Posted on 03/16/2025 5:38:42 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Khalil’s identity is substantially more complicated than the media make it appear, and the reality goes to the roots of the worldwide jihad.
If I heard and read right, the alleged leader of the antisemitic mobs at Columbia Mahmoud Khalil was born in Syria, holds an Algerian passport, and calls himself a “Palestinian.” Which is it?
I get the “Algerian passport” part. Possibly the longest chapter in my long book on the invention of the “Palestinians” is on the pivotal role of Algeria in inventing this antisemitic lie. Before the war in Vietnam in the 1960s became an international cause célèbre, the world’s focus in the 1950s was on Algeria during its intifada-like terrorist rebellion against the French.
It was the French who had created Algeria, starting with the invasion of the regency city-state of Algiers in 1830, and they drafted the boundaries of this large country. The “jihadic” revolution against the French in 1954 took center stage in that decade among many indigenous peoples throwing off their European overlords in gory, terroristic violence. Algeria was the focus of the Marxist Frantz Fanon, a member of the Algerian Front de libération nationale (“FLN”). In his The Wretched of the Earth, he glorified Third World terror horrors against their European masters.
I have invented the term “jihadic” because the rebels did not see themselves as patriotic “Algerians.” Instead, they defined themselves solely as Muslims. All serious historians writing on the uprising routinely referred to the rebels not as Algerians but Muslims.
However, in 1954, the leaders in Algiers, after over 120 years of exposure to French culture, had the wits to cast their rebellion in political terms to win over the Leftists in France, such as those two contemptible fools Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir. Describing their violence as religion-motivated
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
He is the ringleader of that gang of jugheads at Columbia.
L
Mahmoud is a terrorist, rabble-rouser, anathema to everything cherished by the Western world, Christianity and Judaism.
He is a professional seditionist and supporter of murder.
He should be sent to Yemen and live with the Houthis and their sexy sheep.
I would personally hang the SOB.
Are you so sure?
I realize it’s the globolefty Guardian but they cited several legal scholars and stated
“Courts have generally found that non-citizens such as Khalil, a legal permanent resident, have the same first amendment protections that citizens do. The question in Khalil’s case is how far those protections extend against a determination by the secretary of state that a foreign national should be deported.”
Link: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/16/mahmoud-khalil-first-amendment-trump
Now maybe the first sentence quited there is correct, and maybe it’s not. We will find out through the courts, I guess.
If this sentence is correct, I have serious reservations:
“After his arrest, immigration officials said they were seeking to deport him under a provision of federal law that gives the US secretary of state, currently Marco Rubio, the power to deport someone if their presence in the country is deemed to “have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States”.
What “serious adverse foreign policy consequences”? Netanyahu’s nose a bit out of joint?
What if an American serviceman met and married a nice German lass while stationed in Germany and brought her home to The States? And she was then imprisoned by the Obama administration for protesting against the prolonged war in Afghanistan? Or by the Biden administration for protesting against our sending billions to Ukraine? Same principle, but how would we feel about that?
it’s a slippery slope. I am leery of it.
He’s the world’s new “Hitler”. His goal is to exterminate the Jews.
I am not implying that he did those things, I am asking you if you would approve of a visa, or revoke one, in a certain hypothetical scenario. The purpose is to draw a distinction between the right to free speech and the privilege of a visa (or a green card).
Again, the person in question holds a permanent resident card, not a mere visa. He apparently qualified for a green card after marrying an American citizen.
He originally came here with a student visa in 2022. He would have had no cause to want to come here to do such things because the pro-Palestinian protests were not yet a thing back in 2022.
You are trying to get me to argue ridiculous hypothetical questions. Such endeavors are a waste of time. We might as well argue the classic “what would chairs look like if our knees bent the other way like flamingos?” I prefer to stick to the real world and facts of the case.
What if a Libyan came here on a student visa before terrorists started hostilities there? And then, after we started bombing his country on behalf of the terrorists he protested the bombing? And the Obama administration imprisoned him for protesting even though he held a green card after marrying a citizen? That’s closer to the case in question.
It seems to me they chose a strange hill to defend. It would have been much easier and less controversial to simply decline to renew student visas in cases where students had been real troublemakers.
Students who have committed property crimes (defaced buildings, etc.) deserve to be charged with those crimes. If a student ran around terrorizing Jewish students, same. And send them packing. These are crimes. There are laws on the books against defacing property and making terroristic threats. And the laws should be applied.
If Khalil broke any laws, then let him be charged with those crimes. I have yet to see any reports he has been charged with actual crimes. I have seen reports that he has not been charged with any crimes.
I guess we’ll see what happens.
It’s not up to me to substantiate someone else’s claim. It’s up to that person. Have a nice day.
THEY ARE GAINING ACCESS TO THE USA USING “EDUCATION” AS A COVER STORY.
NOTHING is ALL...NOTHING! But they ELECTED them!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.