Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Trump Signs EO That He Will IGNORE All Lower Court Rulings Until SCOTUS Rules on the Constitutionality of Activist Judges
Geller Report.com ^ | 3/12/2025 | Pamela Geller

Posted on 03/12/2025 7:44:27 PM PDT by Beave Meister

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-130 next last
To: bigbob

Umm the President can’t issue a declaration of war only Congress can do that.🤔


61 posted on 03/12/2025 10:02:16 PM PDT by BiteYourSelf ( Earth first, we'll strip mine the other planets later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

Hopefully, true.

This is the right thing to do.

But Amy Coney Barrett cannot be trusted.


62 posted on 03/12/2025 10:28:57 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (The pandemic we suffer from is not COVID. It is Marxist Democrat Leftism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortes fortuna juvat

>>” And secondly, he [Trump] intimated that he would abide by whatever decision the Supreme Court handed down. That was an egregious error for which he, all future Presidents, and the American people will regret.”

He’s said what virtually every president since Andrew Jackson has said. To describe that as somehow precedent-setting shows an ignorance of history. If he had said he was going to ignore SCOTUS then THAT would have been precedent-setting.


63 posted on 03/12/2025 10:54:36 PM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

If this isn’t true, IT SHOULD BE. The Feral RATS in black robes are the greatest threat to America, ever!

64 posted on 03/12/2025 11:37:28 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

.


65 posted on 03/13/2025 12:00:19 AM PDT by LibertyWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

No one else is reporting this. I will side with it’s not true.


66 posted on 03/13/2025 12:18:48 AM PDT by roving (Deplorable MAGA Garbage )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

If it’s true, it’s odd. If his goal is to get the word out that he’s ignoring stupid frivolous rulings, just post it to Truth Social and X. Everyone will get the message. Doing it via EO doesn’t really “fit”.


67 posted on 03/13/2025 12:35:33 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

As ClearCase_guy insightfully posted: we, the people, were “reassured,” that not only were Biden’s actions “presumed valid,” but it would be a “violation of the sanctity of the executive branch” to investigate, because his pardons are fully within the president’s official duties.


It’s kind of funny how this seems to work.
<><>we have a Democrat president diagnosed with dementia so his tax paid unelected staff do whatever they want, with no legal authority; it’s all valid, because it’s within demented Biden’s “official duties.”

<><>there’s a Republican president, winning big in a national election, fully in possession of his faculties, carrying out the will of the voters, but a judge gets to call the shots, gets to decide what is “permissible” within Trump’s Executive Branch. And so does the Supreme Court.

Call Congress: (202) 224-3121
U.S. House switchboard operator.
Shakeup Congress on social media.
copy to @potus, @realdonaldtrump @DonaldJTrumpJr @StevenCheung @TrumpWarRoom
Attach news clips, other relevant documents, links.

Message: We, the people, were “reassured,” that not only were Biden’s actions “presumed valid,” but it would be a “violation of the sanctity of the executive branch” to investigate, because his pardons are fully within the president’s official duties.

We demand DOJ investigate Biden’s cognitive decline
and his misguided use of the presidential pardon.


68 posted on 03/13/2025 1:02:52 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

I’m not clickin’ on this bait, but I hope it’s legit.


69 posted on 03/13/2025 1:04:58 AM PDT by Bullish (I've never seen such morons... Have you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau; All

End run?


70 posted on 03/13/2025 2:17:00 AM PDT by SMARTY (In politics, stupidity is not a handicap. Napoleon Bonaparte I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
"How'd you like if Obama would have ignored Supreme Court decisions on gun control, Citizens United, the Obamacare Medicaid mandate, or his Clean Power Plan? Cuts both ways."

Actually, this (questionable) story is not that Trump would ignore rulings from the Supreme Court, but rather that he would ignore rulings from lower courts until they've been validated by the Supreme Court.

And, this makes PLENTY of sense.

71 posted on 03/13/2025 3:07:28 AM PDT by The Duke (Not without incident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

They’re so gullible because they unwittingly make assumptions rather than than look further into things that are not necessarily safe to assume. What they lack is a healthy skepticism and a strong enough will to survive.


72 posted on 03/13/2025 3:46:43 AM PDT by equaviator (If 60 is the new 40 then 35 must be the new 15.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Colorado Doug

It isn’t.


73 posted on 03/13/2025 4:07:43 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

True, who knew we had hundreds of black robed presidents.

I think an EO requiring DOGE to audit all of their computers and finances would work even better


74 posted on 03/13/2025 4:28:07 AM PDT by blitz128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Keep looking!


75 posted on 03/13/2025 4:31:59 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blitz128

so far, the “judicial”-coverups and treason
involve ignored economics to their children and wives, too.


76 posted on 03/13/2025 4:56:14 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

He’s said what virtually every president since Andrew Jackson has said. To describe that as somehow precedent-setting shows an ignorance of history.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And your statement shows an ignorance of reading comprehension because nowhere in my statement did I imply that his position is precedent-setting. What I did imply was that he should NOT do what every President since A. Jackson has done, and that of course would be precedent-setting, and that is exactly what he should do IMHO.


77 posted on 03/13/2025 5:08:13 AM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (President Trump is America's long-awaited SUPREME Commander in Chief. Deus Vult!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

These judges are as corrupt and dirty as the politicians and need to be exposed


78 posted on 03/13/2025 5:10:26 AM PDT by blitz128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

“This one smells like BS to me.”

This is easy to figure out. I do not know where to look, however there should be an updated web site listing all of Trump’s EO’s to date.


79 posted on 03/13/2025 5:10:29 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Privatize the administrative state!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

“This one smells like BS to me.”

This is easy to figure out. It’s BS. The Federal Register is up to date. There is no mention of this EO.


80 posted on 03/13/2025 5:12:08 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Privatize the administrative state!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson