[pierrem15]

Alex Jones is full of it, as usual.

[quantim]

Also something else to consider regardless on how true this story might be the warlords in Ukraine may have pushed Zelensky into this mess all along with the threat of killing Zelensky himself if he didn’t bring back more billions for them to maintain their mini-oligarchies.

[Wallace T.]

Is there a direct quote from Prime Minister Starmer stating that he would send British Army combat units? Did President Macron make the same statement respective to French military? Until I see comments directly from these leaders, I will remain unconvinced.

[rdcbn1]

Not going to happen . The UK can’t even defend Big Ben, much less Ukraine

[EnderWiggin1970]

We need to start bombing London and Berlin and Paris and start a real war for liberation.

[No.6]

Let's make this easy.

Article 5

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Article 6

For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack:

• on the territory of any of the Parties in Europe or North America, on the Algerian Departments of France 2, on the territory of Turkey or on the Islands under the jurisdiction of any of the Parties in the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer;
• on the forces, vessels, or aircraft of any of the Parties, when in or over these territories or any other area in Europe in which occupation forces of any of the Parties were stationed on the date when the Treaty entered into force or the Mediterranean Sea or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.

No part of this states or implies "when the parties of NATO go adventuring off somewhere and get killed" and no part of Ukraine meets the criteria of Article 6.

[katana]

Consider the source. Who's the Napoleon that's going to lead to victory over Russia? T-shirt guy? The NATO country that will put an end to such talk is Poland, in private if not in public. They have a bad (three if you count Belarus and Ukraine) neighbor. So what else is new? The last people who want an Article V situation are the Poles. And they now have the military weight to count.

[Bikkuri]

It is officially time to leave N.A.T.O. on their own.

[catnipman]

“E.U. Leaders Just Announced That Europe Will Send Troops To Directly Fight Russia in Ukraine”

I must have missed that announcement: could you please post a link to the announcement by EU leaders that they’re sending troops to DIRECTLY fight russia in the ukraine?

[SaveFerris]

[b4me]

A Jones may want to watch his blood pressure and especially his anger while driving a vehicle on public road.

If it’s so important to make video stop the car.

[VetoBill]

The setup is this:

Send troops under the guise of being “peacekeepers”.
When those peacekeepers get attacked, marshal western world outrage to leverage into open warfare.

What goes on behind the scenes:
Those peacekeepers will only enforce a ceasefire one-way. Those troops will act only against Russian aggression, not Ukrainian actions. Ukraine will still wage war, using outside forces as a screen against Russian responses. Ukraine will pass unmolested through western forces, attack, and if necessary retreat back through those western forces. It is likely Ukraine will even stage forces alongside peacekeepers to draw Russian fire.

Peacekeepers are supposed to enforce a ceasefire BOTH ways; this peacekeeping role is mere subterfuge masking the open entry of co-belligerents.

[cpdiii]

Not my dog and not my fight.