Skip to comments.
Iran Has Enough Highly Enriched Uranium for Six Nuclear Weapons
MSN | WSJ ^
| 02/26/2025
| Laurence Norman
Posted on 02/26/2025 8:03:40 AM PST by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
1
posted on
02/26/2025 8:03:40 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Iran has had enough material to make a working device for some time.
2
posted on
02/26/2025 8:05:25 AM PST
by
rdcbn1
(TV )
To: rdcbn1
and Saddam has weapons of mass destruction.
3
posted on
02/26/2025 8:07:52 AM PST
by
algore
To: BenLurkin
As they have been saying for ages….the issue is the delivery system.
Getting the materials to implode on a target is the key. I guess you could make a bomb and deliver it in a truck or ship. But it is likely that the radiation coming from it would be noticeable from a distance.
Certainly, Iranian missile tech is not at the stage to deliver this kind of weapon.
I would be most concerned with some type of dirty bomb delivered in a container.
In any event, it appears that the increased stories about this stuff portend an attack by Israel or the US. My concern there is that a bunker buster bomb is going to create a dirty bomb effect in some Iranian city. That kind of mistake would backfire on Israel.
To: BenLurkin
More warmongering from the WSJ. Iran does not want a nuke! WSJ is just another Never Trumper neocon rag trying sell weapons for its MIC masters.
Trump will broker an Israeli/Iranian deal. The WSJ can’t accept that prospect.
5
posted on
02/26/2025 8:11:10 AM PST
by
hardspunned
(Look for the“Putin Stooge” libel, news from Ukraine you’ve gradually grown to trust over 30 months s)
To: BenLurkin
in recent weeks,
Blaming Trump.
6
posted on
02/26/2025 8:11:21 AM PST
by
Falcon4.0
To: BenLurkin
Six Nuclear Weapons
1. Tel Aviv
2. Tel Aviv - just to be sure
3. Rome
4. Rome - just to be sure
5. NYC
6. Chicago
7
posted on
02/26/2025 8:12:47 AM PST
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
To: BenLurkin
8
posted on
02/26/2025 8:14:52 AM PST
by
libertylover
(Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
To: BenLurkin
I’ll bet Mossad has an eyeball on this, shouldn’t be long now.
9
posted on
02/26/2025 8:17:08 AM PST
by
Rappini
("No man is entitled to the blessings of freedom unless he be vigilant in it's preservation" MacArthr)
To: rdcbn1
Iran has had enough material to make a working device for some time. I suspect you are right. I also suspect the Iranian facilities are so far underground that even a bunker-buster bomb wouldn't destroy them.
10
posted on
02/26/2025 8:17:32 AM PST
by
libertylover
(Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
To: hardspunned
"Iran does not want a nuke!" Why, they wouldn't take one if you gave it to them! They just want to focus on more conventional explosive devices.
11
posted on
02/26/2025 8:22:43 AM PST
by
Flag_This
(They're lying.)
To: BenLurkin
"The increase in Iran’s holdings of uranium enriched to 60%, or nearly weapons grade"Weapons-grade uranium is at least 90%-enriched U-235.
12
posted on
02/26/2025 8:24:43 AM PST
by
Carl Vehse
(Make Austin Texas Again!)
To: PIF
Tel Aviv is the only one in range...maybe.
Their short range missiles don’t have the capacity to lift a warhead.
13
posted on
02/26/2025 8:27:50 AM PST
by
Zathras
To: Flag_This
Give them some daisy cutters but deliver them from a safe altitude.
14
posted on
02/26/2025 8:34:09 AM PST
by
equaviator
(If 60 is the new 40 then 35 must be the new 15.)
To: BenLurkin
If an Iranian leader has the bomb and doesn’t immediately use it, he’ll likely be murdered and replaced by someone who will use it. The anti Israeli and American propaganda has created a beast even the creators can’t manage.
15
posted on
02/26/2025 8:34:18 AM PST
by
Gen.Blather
(Wait! I said that out loud? )
To: Vermont Lt
I would be most concerned with some type of dirty bomb delivered in a container.
Possible but if that was their main goal they wouldn't bother enriching U235 content.
To: equaviator
C-130 rollin' down the strip.
Airborne MOAB gonna take a little trip.
17
posted on
02/26/2025 8:39:41 AM PST
by
Flag_This
(They're lying.)
To: rdcbn1
60% will not go boom. Cannot.
18
posted on
02/26/2025 8:53:19 AM PST
by
bobbo666
To: algore
“...and Saddam has weapons of mass destruction...
You’re right, he did. And he used them.
wy69
Well, lets give them a 7th, special delivery, and watch them all go off together.
20
posted on
02/26/2025 9:19:33 AM PST
by
curious7
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson