Posted on 02/21/2025 6:50:53 AM PST by dynachrome
The data provided in the downloads via our map is from the Federal Election Commission. There are many anomalies in the FEC data and we continue to find more each week. For a few examples, the data should be the same if you download the same query via their website versus using an API. It is not. Another is there are transactions shown completed but dated in the future. A third example is they appear to be counting a transaction fee as a “contribution”. A fourth is they show a State as “ZZ”, we wonder where that is located in the USA. A fifth is there is double counting. And how about this one – we have seen the same data on the screen change a few minutes later in real-time.
(Excerpt) Read more at electionwatch.info ...
Systemic election fraud should be Patel’s most important target.
Most of what is described is bad data entry and controls that don’t stop some of it, ie. future dates.
Most reports submitted by the committees by excel spreadsheet. It would be difficult to have check controls on that operation.
I recently downloaded and review data from 5 different federal campaigns. One of them had a 20% error rate on the contributor zip code. I found data entry errors on all of the reports.
later
Has Trump said anything about voting system reform?
A 20% error rate on the zip code? Who is putting in the bad data? The campaign trying to hide funny business, or the donors trying to reduce their junk mail?
Just bad data entry by the campaign. The contributors were legit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.