“This was not what our government was designed to do”
He left out an important word.
Should not CONTINUE to be
However, he is pretending just like a good GOP senator
The entire world is not receiving this funding
It is primarily our politicians
Honestly. No one watches the Phil Hartman Clinton parody Read between the lines of THAT one. Clinton’s daughter received 57 million on its way to Haiti
Nor the Clinton Foundation, 500,000 other NFP’s, or NGO’s with the sole purpose of kickback laundering, while virtue signaling with a media also benefitting as their PR agencies for hire to shape the news.
He’s right..we have veterans who have given their entire lives to protect US living on the streets in cardboard boxes meanwhile we give BILLIONS of dollars in foreign aid which doesn’t even help those in need, the money gets funneled back in NGO’s to Democrats that is why they are b*tching about the money
Yeah we know. That’s why we voted for Trump. Rand likes to play pretend as if he is somehow directing this or has anything at all to do it which he of course does not. Rand didn’t even endorse Trump for President. This is all Trump and Elon, no thanks to Rand and his ilk of speechifiers in Congress.
Rumble podcast - AlphaWarriorShow
CIA & USAID Corruption around the world exposed in this podcast. A must hear & share.
OPERATION GLADIO - CHAPTER 44 - “Exposed: The USAID Deception” PART 2 - EP.385 (with Col Towner-Watkins)
https://rumble.com/v6k4yqg-operation-gladio-chapter-44-exposea.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
And so much of it is spent on overhead and graft without even getting to the ones supposedly it is designed to help.
I find Revelation-18 very interesting these days.
Fine tuned it a bit.
"Sen. Rand Paul: "The United States should not be the sugar daddy for the entire world""
Justice Joseph Story had indicated that the peacetime Congress has no express constitutional power to justify foreign spending.
“If the tax be not proposed for the common defence, or general welfare, but for other objects, wholly extraneous, (as for instance, for propagating Mahometanism among the Turks, or giving aids and subsidies to a foreign nation, to build palaces for its kings, or erect monuments to its heroes,) it would be wholly indefensible upon constitutional principles [emphases added].” — Justice Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution 2 (1833).