Answer #1: I always do.
Answer #2: That's what she said.
BREAKING: First Circuit denies Trump’s Motion for Stay pending appeal without prejudice related to order barring freezing spending. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca1.52482/gov.uscourts.ca1.52482.00108246952.0_1.pdf Teed up now for Supreme Court, but Trump Administration may wait for further order.
X user reveals how DOGE can beat left-wing activist judges at their own game…
Revolver.News ^ | February 11, 2025 | Revolver Staff
Posted on 2/11/2025, 5:43:15 PM by packagingguy
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4296838/posts
@DOGE, a single district judge has issued a ruling blocking the executive branch from access to Treasury data. There’s a simple fix: DOJ should demand injunction bonds.
This will be a repeat problem for the Trump administration, just like it was in the first term, unless something is done to rein in frivolous injunctions. Activist judges could single-handedly gum up the entire Trump/DOGE agenda.
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c), judges can issue injunctions “ONLY IF” the suing party posts a bond to cover potential damages if they’re wrong. But guess what? This rule is hardly used!
When I was in the White House, in Trump’s first term, I suggested this, but DOJ didn’t make it happen. Imagine if we had applied this to the travel ban – activists would think twice before blocking policies with potentially billions at stake.