Posted on 02/06/2025 5:29:46 AM PST by Miami Rebel
There is strong nationwide support among Canadians for putting export taxes on oil shipments if needed to retaliate against US President Donald Trump’s tariffs, a new poll suggests.
Export taxes on energy have been considered politically divisive in Canada, but the robust backing shows the level of anger among the Canadian public over Trump’s actions — and potentially gives Justin Trudeau’s government greater license to threaten the levies if Trump revives the tariffs next month.
Overall, 82% of Canadians support unilaterally raising the price on oil exports to the US if Trump tariffs Canadian goods but exempts oil, according to a poll by Nanos Research Group conducted for Bloomberg News. The survey was conducted from Jan. 31 to Feb. 3 among 1,077 respondents, and is considered accurate within 3 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.
The poll found 72% support among people living in the western Prairie provinces, where Canada’s oil resources are concentrated. The premiers of both Alberta and Saskatchewan have publicly opposed any use of export taxes, but the survey suggests the leaders are out of step with most of their residents.
Nearly 90% of people in the Atlantic provinces — which have offshore oil projects — support using export taxes if necessary, which is the strongest regional level of support found by the poll.
Furthermore, the poll found 79% of people nationwide support retaliatory tariffs on US imports, even if it means Canadians will end up paying higher prices for goods.
Oil is Canada’s single biggest point of leverage with the US, which imports about 4 million barrels a day from its northern neighbor. Many US refineries, particularly in the Midwest, rely on heavy crude oil sourced from Canada and do not have easy replacements for it.
On Saturday, Trump signed an executive order that would levy 25% duties on all Canadian exports to the US except for the broad category of “energy,” which would be tariffed at a lower rate of 10%. Trump declared the tariffs were necessary to stop the flow of fentanyl from Canada into the US, despite the fact that US-collected statistics show no evidence this is a significant problem.
The tariffs were delayed by 30 days on Monday after Trump spoke with Trudeau twice by phone, and said he was satisfied by Canadian actions such as appointing a “fentanyl czar” and adding more border security resources. Trudeau also agreed to pause retaliatory tariffs on C$155 billion ($108 billion) worth of US goods.
However, Trump has explicitly kept the tariff threat on the table, saying the coming weeks will be used “to see whether or not a final economic deal with Canada can be structured.”
Bloomberg has previously reported the Canadian government has examined the use of export taxes on key commodities such as oil, uranium and potash if Trump attempted to put economy-wide tariffs on Canada but exempted those resources due to America’s reliance on them.
Trudeau has struck a cautious tone. When he announced Canada’s retaliation package on Saturday, he said it was important that “no one region of the country or one industry carries a larger burden than anyone else.”
“We will not be moving forward on issues that further divide the country, which is why we’re working with all premiers to look at different ways we can encourage the Americans to step back from these trade actions,” he said.
To be sure, export levies on oil would likely be a last resort for Canada in a trade war with the US, as they would harm a major economic driver in the northern nation and potentially raise the cost of Canadian oil that runs through the US via Enbridge Inc.’s Line 5 pipeline en route to Ontario and Quebec.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith — whose province is home to the lion’s share of Canada’s oil deposits — has reacted furiously to the idea of export taxes, and refused to sign a joint statement by Canadian political leaders last month because it didn’t rule out measures to curb energy exports to the US.
“Until these threats cease, Alberta will not be able to fully support the federal government’s plan in dealing with the threatened tariffs,” Smith said when rejecting the statement in January.
(As a stockholder in South Bow, I have a vested interest in the continued flow of Canadian crude from Alberta to Houston and the northeast.)
Good. We can use everything else on them.
Just keep off of I-95.
FAFO Canada eh
Nanos Research Group...
Nuff said.
That’s their real secret weapon…..driving slow in the left lane on a US interstate.
The only war here is the war on traitor Trudeau [how much USAID money has he been getting].
+1
The Keystone Pipeline that Biden shut down would have been a key replacement for Canadian oil by moving the crude from the North Dakota oil fields to the refineries in the Mississippi Delta. In the short run, retaliation by Canada will increase the price of distillate fuels in the US. In the long run, however, that price increase will stimulate exploration/production with prices decreasing over time.
I wonder if these people surveyed were asked any pointed questions about Trudeau’s overall leadership on cross border issues such as the illegal trafficking of firearms and people.
Would not hold my breath.
“Oil is Canada’s single biggest point of leverage with the US, which imports about 4 million barrels a day from its northern neighbor. Many US refineries, particularly in the Midwest, rely on heavy crude oil sourced from Canada and do not have easy replacements for it.”
I wonder what Dancing Girl would think if we replaced the Canadian oil with Russian oil.
And what is Canada’s refining capacity? I think Trump understands Canada’s dependence on the USA. My guess is that’s why he keep trolling them as the 51st state.
Oil is only good for them to use until we get production ramped up. Drill, baby, drill! and all that.
Canadians rely on the same oil after it has been refined in the United States.
Good observation.
LMAO
Canada can F off.
Just another reason to develop our own resources.
The United States has oil, coal, and natural gas for us to be energy independent from the rest of the world, it is only the environmentalist that have managed to lock up these resources.
You have to wonder just who is paying these organizations?
What about the climates????
“Drill, Baby Drill!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.