The only way to do anything with any sense of permanence is to get legislation updated.
Most legislation provides wide latitude in how it’s implemented - just look at the diff between Trump and Biden’s handling of immigration.
Now extend that thought to the EPA - one administration can simply keep pollution down, while another could send us into the stone age.
The wide swing in activity among differing administrations exemplifies the inherent instability of the current government.
The wider that gap gets, the more we get like central and south america where depending on who’s in office, depends on who lives or dies, which just leads to revolutionary activity and terrorism.
STONE AGE:
EVER WONDER WHERE A CAVEMAN WENT TO THE BATHROOM???
>The only way to do anything with any sense of permanence is to get legislation updated.
Ah, another example of (R)N(C) ‘debating’ from Step {X} != 1.
The ONLY way is to eliminate via Courts as unconstitutional; since Congress+ isn’t going to 1) reign in...ANY thing/body 2) abolish ANY thing/body
“By WHAT authority? (Art/Sec/Cl)” Then be ready for the immediate counter via A1S8, 9th, 10th (if not 4th, 5th, 13th & 14th A.)
Course, we have the “No Right is ‘absolute’ (negating Rights from the get go” SCOTUS these days...
But, MAYBE, just a FEW more ‘conservative’ Congress-critters/judges will do the trick...THIS time *rolls eyes*
I, too, have been saying that for years.
The assertion underscores the underrated - and mostly forgotten - Awan Bros scandal.