Posted on 01/22/2025 9:41:19 AM PST by RoosterRedux
E.T phone home.
Ping to: “’What Are UFOs’ Examines Our Fascination with the Unknown/Time Magazine”
Foo Fighters is a much better name for them.
To the trolls desperate to shut down these discussions: please stop with the "true believer" accusations. The only true believers here seem to be those who are absolutely certain about what UFOs are not—classic examples of Dunning-Kruger overconfidence.
I lived and was later stationed at Roswell NM (Walker AFB) in 1959-1967. I never heard of any UFO nonsense till the base was closed and Roswell needed a new source of income, so they went after the tourists with claims of UFOs. Other towns also grabbed onto the UFO shtick like Aztec NM.
In that time the tabloids were full of UFO stories and some magazines fabricated claims to get their readership up. You would think that after over sixty five years we would have proof by now.
Getting frustrated here. So many sightings. Not one “alien” ship or “being” openly displayed. Every visual recording is strangely just a snippet of a full blown detailed object or event.
If these reports keep on coming and nothing physical is produced for examination...the UFO’s or uap’s are going to fall into Bigfoot or Nessie, or Peter’s wolf territory.
Too bad, but that’s the nature of discovery.
Just sayin’
He stated that he believes UAPs pose a significant threat to pilot and naval operational safety. In his testimony, he highlighted instances of near-midair collisions and the lack of follow-up or guidance for mitigating these risks. He criticized the absence of proper oversight and safety protocols to address UAP encounters, leaving pilots to handle such threats independently.
Gallaudet views this as a critical issue that compromises both military and civilian aviation safety and has called for greater transparency, investigation, and actionable measures to address these risks.
Source: Congress.gov
And the government is determined to keep it that way.
"We have received and analyzed reports that have come to us from all kinds of sources. Of this great mass of reports we have been able adequately to explain the great bulk of them to our own satisfaction. We've been able to explain them as hoaxes, as erroneously identified friendly aircraft, as meteorological or electronic phenomena, or as light aberration.
"However there have been a certain percentage of this volume of reports that have been made by credible observers of relatively incredible things. It is this group of observations that we now are attempting to resolve.
"Our basic difficulty in dealing with these is that there is no measurement of them that makes it possible for us to put them in any pattern that would be profitable for a deliberate sort of analysis to take the next step.
"We have as of date come to only one firm conclusion with respect to this remaining percentage, and that is that it does not contain any pattern of purpose or of consistency that we can relate with any conceivable threat to the United States."
That's pretty much what they government has said about the drones.
"We don't know what the hell they are, but you citizens have no need to worry.
That's like a lifeguard at the beach saying, "We see a big unidentified fish in the water, but you swimmers are completely safe."
.gov
“We don’t know what they are but we know they are friendly.”
Lol.
The only thing we do know with metaphysical certainty is that .gov is lying.
But only when their lips are moving (or their finger are tapping on the keyboard).
In the middle ages UFO’s looked like comets.
In the 50’s they looked like hub caps.
Now they look like quad-copters with FAA approved lighting.
Ezekiel 1 “wheel within a wheel”.
????????
Its been over 2000 years, and we don't really have proof that Alexander The Great existed. All we have is circumstantial evidence.
Good post.
:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.