To: Wuli
All I was basically saying was the flat LA basin was not affected by the fires.
6 posted on
01/18/2025 11:54:05 AM PST by
DallasBiff
(Apology not accepted.la is not the sharpest knife in the drawer)
To: DallasBiff
No. What you actually did was ask a question: “Why was the L.A. Basin spared from the recent fires.” That’s a question, not a statement.
7 posted on
01/18/2025 11:57:34 AM PST by
Wuli
To: DallasBiff
The wildfires feed on the explosive chapparal that covers the hillsides and ravines, and the Santa Ana winds blow the fires onto the homes which fools build adjacent to those areas. The rest of the Basin doesn’t possess vast expanses of combustible chapparal.
8 posted on
01/18/2025 12:00:03 PM PST by
Hebrews 11:6
(“…all who were appointed for eternal life believed.” Acts 13:48)
To: DallasBiff
All I was basically saying was the flat LA basin was not affected by the fires.
Iow, you had a brain fart and decided to post lol...okay, fine.
The other poster was correct, tho. You're implying there some definite or interesting reason(s) why the basin did not burn.
Probably has to do with wind direction & speed and the availibility of fast-burning underbrush.
10 posted on
01/18/2025 12:05:43 PM PST by
citizen
(Political incrementalism is like compound interest for liberals - every little bit adds up.)
To: DallasBiff
All I was basically saying was the flat LA basin was not affected by the fires. Because these were brush fires. Brush grows on the hillsides.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson