Posted on 01/16/2025 6:38:22 AM PST by Red Badger
Good point but the crazies still won’t buy it.
Falcon Heavy also can and frequently does fully expendable yeets. When it does it takes 140,000# with it or with just the center booster expended they can out 120,000# into LEO while landing the twin side boosters back on land, that in theory could double drone ship land the side boosters and get the same 140,000lb while expending just the center booster. The limit on the top end is structural for the second stage not the fuel needed to get it there. Having the boosters not have to do a boost back burn and just a landing burn leaves a nearly full center core at booster separation enough fuel to take the full 63 tonnes to LEO. SpaceX will never do a twin drone ship so it’s purely academic. Fully Expendable FH can be had for $150 million or less. Even with New Glenn Falcon Heavy is still the third largest launcher on earth behind SLS and Starship. NG slots in fourth place.
And that’s why the landing platforms are unmanned. 😳😊👍
“New Glenn is named after John Glenn, the first American to orbit Earth.”
And a lot of SWAGs.
I believe Musk has stated that everything is possible within the limits of the laws of physics. And even then...
Yeah—there are a lot of very smart folks trying to figure out how to violate the “laws of physics”.
I like their chances.
The most important first step is belief that you can do it.
Yes. Or discovering that someone else, or something else, has done it.
I was irritated by their commentary, it seemed like they were almost oblivious to the communications of mission controllers.
Cool! I envy you! 🙂
It’s going to be exciting. I can’t wait. Got some chores to get out of the way first!
And a lot of SWAGs.
****************************************
There is a serious amount of “art” involved too, as in lots of years learning from your mistakes. Difficult to pass on that kind of learning.
Talking “mentors” here....
I predict they’re going to have big problems with that one 😧
Yeah, we got laid off/retired. 🤔😂👍
I predict they’re going to have big problems with that one
—
That’s what ‘testing to failure’ means. Finding and fixing problems in real time, using fully assembled hardware, which leads to rapid development, every failure is a success because you know what does not work or what needs to be fixed/redesigned.
This is the opposite of usual procedures where, after years of individual component testing, a fully rigged example is tested with all components assembled together for the first time - NASA’s SLS for example. Then more years pass as the example is fine tuned or redesigned.
I was just kidding because I posted that AFTER the break-up. Easy to be a prophet that way!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.