To: Jonty30
Here’s a simple way to understand it. The use of pornography is adultery, given what Christ tells us about looking on a woman with lust.
The founders did not intend to protect pornography.
47 posted on
01/15/2025 6:04:54 PM PST by
reasonisfaith
(What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
To: reasonisfaith
If they didn’t want it protected, they would have wrote a clause to not include it. The lack of clause means they protected it.
52 posted on
01/15/2025 6:07:02 PM PST by
Jonty30
(Liberals are a fulfillment of II Tim3:5. We are instructed to have nothing to do with those people. )
To: reasonisfaith
“Here’s a simple way to understand it. The use of pornography is adultery, given what Christ tells us about looking on a woman with lust”
I think of it that way as well. And I am certainly not perfect.
60 posted on
01/15/2025 6:10:09 PM PST by
steve86
(Numquam accusatus, numquam ad curiam ibit, numquam ad carcerem™)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson