Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30

Here’s a simple way to understand it. The use of pornography is adultery, given what Christ tells us about looking on a woman with lust.

The founders did not intend to protect pornography.


47 posted on 01/15/2025 6:04:54 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith

If they didn’t want it protected, they would have wrote a clause to not include it. The lack of clause means they protected it.


52 posted on 01/15/2025 6:07:02 PM PST by Jonty30 (Liberals are a fulfillment of II Tim3:5. We are instructed to have nothing to do with those people. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: reasonisfaith

“Here’s a simple way to understand it. The use of pornography is adultery, given what Christ tells us about looking on a woman with lust”

I think of it that way as well. And I am certainly not perfect.


60 posted on 01/15/2025 6:10:09 PM PST by steve86 (Numquam accusatus, numquam ad curiam ibit, numquam ad carcerem™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson