Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: reasonisfaith

I haven’t run away, but I am tiring of the overall arguement. It doesn’t matter what you want done about pornography, it is Constitutional.

Any law that is passed that outlaws pornography will be used against the Bible. However, you can’t see that because you think the Supreme Court will carve out an exception to this. They won’t. That’s not how law works.

Do you need me to say that the Supreme Court will make it a death penalty offense to be a liberal, with the death penalty for missing Sunday Church to end this conversation? I will say it just to end it, because you think the Supreme Court will carve out exemptions in Constitutional law that suits you.

I can’t help you if you are convinced of such a viewpoint because your viewpoint is 100% against the written words of the Constitution.

Write what you want, I won’t respond.


250 posted on 01/21/2025 8:24:25 AM PST by Jonty30 (If you ate your twin in the womb, your pronouns should be we/us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30

It’s true that the courts have yet to articulate a ruling banning pornography.

But when they do, the basis of the ruling will likely have to do with the following fundamental interests of the court:

1. national security

2. public safety

3. decency and morality


253 posted on 01/21/2025 8:34:14 AM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson