Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MeanWestTexan

The point is that any erroneous ruling by previous, compromised Supreme Court justices can be discarded by later, uncompromised justices.

Pornography is not free speech. Pornography is not “having their say.”

It doesn’t take a genius to see this. It only takes a court ruled by justices who haven’t been blackmailed or unlawfully installed.


218 posted on 01/17/2025 1:26:53 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]


To: MeanWestTexan; Jonty30

In fact, we should renew the focus on the question of pornography and free speech.

Ironically, the communists and other globalists will try as hard as they can to shut down this kind of discussion.


219 posted on 01/17/2025 1:29:49 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson