Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30

But the founders never intended protection from pornography, which was infinitely less available then and massively against the culture of the day.

There never has been and never will be a viable argument demonstrating original intent to protect pornography.


105 posted on 01/15/2025 8:11:52 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith

They weren’t ignorant of pornography. They were knowledgeable men of the world. They were well aware of naked pictures that passed around in their day, but they still didn’t write against it.

If you got pornography banned, you’d find the Supremes would rule against the Bible as a rule of law. That’s how liberals think. When you ban something, the liberal will take that ban and apply everywhere including the Bible.


108 posted on 01/15/2025 8:15:10 PM PST by Jonty30 (Liberals are a fulfillment of II Tim3:5. We are instructed to have nothing to do with those people. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson