Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meta now lets users call women 'property' and gay people 'mentally ill' [butthurt liberal author]
Mashable ^ | 1/8/2025 | Amanda Yeo

Posted on 01/08/2025 9:30:41 AM PST by simpson96

Good news for anyone wanting to spew hate and make the world a worse place: Meta has amended its Hateful Conduct policy to be more permissive to bad behaviour, allowing divisive and discriminatory content to thrive on its platforms. Users on Facebook, Instagram, and Threads are now allowed to call gay people "mentally ill", women "property", and entire ethnicities "diseases".

Instagram blocked LGBTQ+ content by accident, Meta claims The tech giant made significant changes to its Hateful Conduct policy on Tuesday, lifting prohibitions against a wide range of divisive and harmful rhetoric. Notably, Meta's amended policy completely removed restrictions against dehumanising people on the basis of a "protected characteristic" by likening them to certain inanimate objects, filth, and diseases such as cancer. Users are also now permitted to state that protected characteristics don't or shouldn't exist, or are inferior.

Protected characteristics are defined by Meta as "race, ethnicity, national origin, disability, religious affiliation, caste, sexual orientation, sex, gender identity, [or] serious disease."

Meta further removed its previous acknowledgement that hateful conduct on its platforms "creates an environment of intimidation and exclusion, and in some cases may promote offline violence."

Equally as notable as the restrictions Meta has removed is the content that it now explicitly allows, with harmful anti-LGBTQ rhetoric specifically permitted. In a video posted on Tuesday, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg stated that the company is removing restrictions that are "out of touch with mainstream discourse."

"We do allow allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation, given political and religious discourse about transgenderism and homosexuality and common non-serious usage of words like 'weird,'" wrote Meta.

The American Psychological Association (APA) is clear that being transgender or same-sex attracted are not mental disorders, as neither cause significant distress or disability. Each was removed from the APA's official list of mental illnesses in 2012 and 1973 respectively. In fact, the APA notes that it is discrimination and lack of acceptance in society which can lead to transgender people suffering from the actual mental disorders of anxiety and depression. (snip)

These changes coincide with Meta's decision to eliminate fact-checkers and replace them with a Community Notes system. Zuckerberg claimed that fact-checkers have become "too politically biased," and that "what started as a movement to be more inclusive has increasingly been used to shut down opinions and shut out people with different ideas."

As noted above, many such opinions are actively harmful and have no basis in fact. Even so, Meta seems determined to platform such content, with Chief Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan stating in a blog post that they have been "limiting legitimate political debate and censoring too much trivial content and subjecting too many people to frustrating enforcement actions."

It appears that in Meta's estimation, subjecting users to enforcement of a conduct policy is less acceptable than subjecting them to dehumanisation.

"We’re getting rid of a number of restrictions on topics like immigration, gender identity and gender that are the subject of frequent political discourse and debate," wrote Kaplan. "It’s not right that things can be said on TV or the floor of Congress, but not on our platforms."


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: amandayeo; butthurtfaggot; faggot96; faggotsonfr; howmuchdoesmomcost; meta; simpson96; simpsondiddleskids; simpsonisafaggot; simpsonsmomisawhore
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: simpson96

And the people saying these stupid things will be ostracized by the public as it should be. We don’t need a company to be the commie tyrant so-called guardians of free speech.


41 posted on 01/08/2025 1:26:47 PM PST by vpintheak (Sometimes you’re the windshield, sometimes you’re the bug. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Most Islamists agree with those statements.


42 posted on 01/08/2025 1:42:13 PM PST by rfp1234 (E Porcibus Unum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

I AM NO ONE’S PROPERTY


43 posted on 01/08/2025 1:43:30 PM PST by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob
Amanda previously worked in refugee law to assist people seeking asylum in Australia

She's part of the problem.

44 posted on 01/08/2025 1:45:58 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

Amanda Yeo like so many foreigners and far too many Americans has NO clue about the clear meaning and necessity of freedom of speech.


45 posted on 01/08/2025 2:22:32 PM PST by A strike (You people keep using cash, how we gonna keep track of your ammo purchases?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson