Posted on 01/01/2025 2:10:39 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Panama Canal - strategic importance.
Greenland - stupid.
New York Times — getting sillier day by day
Nope. EUSSR and other powers want control of Greenland.
Frankly, EUSSR being in Greenland violates the debauched-by-the-US-left Monroe Doctrine.
Greenland - strategic importance for two reasons. North Atlantic and Arctic security plus untold mineral wealth.
NY Times just found an acceptable libtard justification for taking the Panama Canal and Greenland.
Its gonna happen!
Lots of oil under Greenland. This is about China. Trump is going to run China out of the Western hemisphere starting with Panama. Greenland is about rare earth minerals and a strategic place for missile defense.
These morons have climate fever.
Article written with a crayon, no doubt.
True Climate Religion believers.
They can’t handle the truth.
Regardless of how "vitally important" Greenland is to the U.S., the U.S. has no right to take it.
It seems half the time, conservatives are shaking their finger at mean imperialists for invading countries that don't belong to them.
The other half the time, conservatives are pushing to expand the empire because ... Merica!
If the ice melts completely, Greenland could cause sea levels to rise as much as 23 feet, according to NASA.
Aren’t we paying AOC and NASA loads of taxpayer money for them to actually do the math? Trust the science but not faux scientists.
Here’s a free algorithm to start, since they haven’t started:
(volume of the current sphere) + (volume of melted ice) ~ (level of actual climate doomage)
Uh-oh, RUN! /sarc
Elon, fly me to the moon, or Mars. Better yet, DOGE the whole project and let us go on unburdened, where no planet has gone before.
Dittos!
I don’t understand why we need to take Greenland from Denmark and it’s certainly not because of “climate change”.
We have never been enemies with Denmark.
I am so totally gonna have the Baskin-Robbins franchise in Thule.
More Bullshit from the New York Slimes
Though I doubt it will happen, why do you believe it is stupid for Trump to wnat Greenland under U.S. control?
We never should have given it back to Denmark after the end of WW2. And should another world war break out or should China make its move, we will have to take it again to protect it. Denmark will not be able to protect Greenland from China anymore than it was able to protect it from the Nazis. The US is the super power and Greenland should be ounder our jurisdiction. Better to do it now than have to fight China after they take it from Denmark.
We never should have given it back to Denmark after the end of WW2. And should another world war break out or should China make its move, we will have to take it again to protect it. Denmark will not be able to protect Greenland from China anymore than it was able to protect it from the Nazis. The US is the super power and Greenland should be ounder our jurisdiction. Better to do it now than have to fight China after they take it from Denmark.
Ugh what a load of BS. Never give up the con.
I don’t know about you, but I’m buying a beach front lot Greenland’s north coast!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.