Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stalin killed millions. A Stanford historian answers the question, was it genocide?
Stanford Report ^ | 9/23/10 | Stanford Report

Posted on 12/29/2024 11:37:48 AM PST by DallasBiff

Historian Norman Naimark argues that today's narrow definition of genocide is Stalin's lasting legacy

Murder on a national scale, yes – but is it genocide? “The word carries a powerful punch,” said Stanford history Professor Norman Naimark. “In international courts, it’s considered the crime of crimes.”

(Excerpt) Read more at news.stanford.edu ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; History
KEYWORDS: california; democide; genocide; itsthemarxismstupid; massmurder; massmurderer; normannaimark; stalin; stanford; uselesseaters; ussr; whatshisfrnick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: chajin
Even my 14 year old grandson found it interesting that when considering these bloody statistics, Hitler is always the go-to guy when discussing genocide and pure evil, with hardly a reference to Stalin and Mao.

I enlightened him.

41 posted on 12/29/2024 1:45:25 PM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chajin
Go back far enough and the actual champions are the Muslim invaders of India. Over a period of several hundred years a conservative estimate of the total number of Hindus and Buddhists killed by war, mass murder of civilians (pogroms), and enslavement (including castration), is 230 million.

Mao and Stalin worked far more efficiently, of course. The one "success" one can attribute to Communism.

42 posted on 12/29/2024 2:00:20 PM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

“Mass murder” doesn’t seem up to describing what Stalin did. But “genocide” isn’t really appropriate, either.
///////
Since WWII it has been the nationalist side of the national socialist that has born the weight genocide. But that’s not true. It was the socialist side of the nationalist socialists that caused the mass murder. Why do we know that? Leftist ideologies Socialism/communism is what Germany Russia China and cambodia all have in common when they committed their atrocities.


43 posted on 12/29/2024 2:00:48 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

.


44 posted on 12/29/2024 2:05:47 PM PST by QBFimi (It is not your responsibility to finish the work of perfecting the world... Tarfon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

It’s properly called “democide” or death by government. Atheist communist regimes are the clear “winners” in that department. See my post here:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4286465/posts?page=60#60

See also:

Democide vs genocide: which is what?

https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/GENOCIDE.HTM


45 posted on 12/29/2024 3:35:05 PM PST by CatHerd (Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Nobody comes close to Mao.


46 posted on 12/29/2024 3:39:15 PM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

It isn’t genocide when Marxists do it.


47 posted on 12/29/2024 3:52:46 PM PST by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

No. That’s how evil they are!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Exactly, which is why I never tire of criticizing people who are in any way allied with the Marxist-Democrat Party. The politicians and those who support them are sick, twisted psychopaths and sociopaths, and as such they are at least as dangerous to America and its people as Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping.


48 posted on 12/29/2024 3:53:28 PM PST by fortes fortuna juvat (Never forget, the Marxist-Democrats & RINOs who would destroy our country ARE STILL HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: daler

[Even my 14 year old grandson found it interesting that when considering these bloody statistics, Hitler is always the go-to guy when discussing genocide and pure evil, with hardly a reference to Stalin and Mao.
I enlightened him.]


The issue with Stalin’s and Mao’s numbers is that we don’t really know what they are. Lacking the authority of an occupying army to delve into their statistics, as occurred in Germany, all we can do is hazard a guess. Post-WW2, we got a pretty good look at European population statistics, down to to the ID level. That’s not true of China, which had iffy census stats anyway, and may have inflated its deaths to keep Allied lifelines going.

Hitler, however, was one of a kind. The term genocide was defined with the Holocaust in mind. But that would make for only a handful of recorded genocides, ever. What distinguished German massacres of Jews from other atrocities, WW2 or otherwise, was the lack of an escape hatch for the victims. In most other massacres, pledging fealty to new rulers or a recanting of past ideological or religious beliefs was a path to salvation. Whereas the only kind of conversion that concerned Hitler was the transformation of Jews into landfill.


49 posted on 12/29/2024 5:05:28 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Twotone
“Mass murder” doesn’t seem up to describing what Stalin did. But “genocide” isn’t really appropriate, either.

I actually th8nk you’re right to make that distinction. Stalin may have committed genocide via famine in Ukraine; I don’t know the details.

The late historian Robert Rummel talked of “democide,” mass extermination by government,

He spent much of his career trying to document it, and wrote a number of books about it. Go to https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE5.HTM if you’d like to learn more.

50 posted on 12/29/2024 5:12:25 PM PST by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ryderann
Don’t forget Pol Pot. He murdered a couple million folks.

Pol Pot percentage-wise is right there. He was only limited buy the relatively small population of Cambodia.

51 posted on 12/29/2024 7:04:04 PM PST by Rummyfan ( In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: untenured

Democide...excellent word!


52 posted on 12/30/2024 4:43:16 AM PST by Twotone ( What's the difference between a politician & a flying pig? The letter "F.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson