Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CrimsonTidegirl

You need to look up what the alliance is for.


75 posted on 12/26/2024 5:13:44 PM PST by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

Notably, I believe NATO goes much further than simple defense vs. Russia. Yes, that defense was an original objective, but, more deeply, if Russia were to just vanish or turn into Winnie the Pooh, you STILL have the problem that a Europe with pieces corkscrewing off on their own is incredibly dangerous. As I mentioned above, we’ve seen that playbook before, and now you can add nukes.

So... a very “tight” commitment and structure, reflective of a “one for all and all for one” philosophy, is necessary, with a big dog (the USA) as a glue to help hold it all together and knock heads to some degree, if need be. Additionally, few of NATO’s members are “can do it all” militaries, so, they have to lean on each other. It is the only answer...

That said, all the major Euro NATO countries are now up to 2% of GDP defense spending, except Italy*, and NATO outside the US is as a whole up to that 2% figure.

*Maybe Giorgia Meloni is cozying up to Elon for a reason — hahaha.


85 posted on 12/26/2024 7:36:46 PM PST by Paul R. (Bin Laden wanted Obama killed so the incompetent VP, Biden, would become President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson