Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DallasBiff

“It seems more likely that He claimed to be the True Rabbi just like He said He was the True Vine and the Good Shepherd and the Only Way to the Father. Everyone else was pretending; He actually was what others could only claim to be.”

Can’t disagree with this.


2 posted on 12/22/2024 12:22:17 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith
Agreed. My take is that Jesus was probably wiser in part because He wasn't trained in the same ol' same ol'.

And then again, what did it mean to be officially trained as a Rabbi then? Particularly with the competing sects of the day. It's not like it was just between the Pharisees and the Sadducees. There were also the Essenes and the Zealots. Some would say the Herodians were a sect (I say it might be best to treat them like more of a political party than a sect).

I bet if someone you were to go back in time and ask one of any of those sects' leaders if leaders in the other sects were Rabbis, you might start a fight.

6 posted on 12/22/2024 12:32:01 PM PST by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson