8 Injustices to Be Redressed against Donald Trump

American Thinker ^ | 19 Dec, 2024 | Donald Russo

[MtnClimber]

As noted by Chief Justice John Roberts in his landmark July 1, 2024 immunity decision in Trump v. U.S., a former president of the United States had never been indicted by the United States prior to Jack Smith’s filing charges against President Trump. The case of USA v. Trump was, ipso facto, a perverse joke. It was a diabolical move to change America. Nonetheless, the federal court system, up to and including the Supreme Court, had to take it seriously. That is why the nefarious forces behind Jack Smith saw to it that the grossly politicized District Court for the District of Columbia should serve as the base of operations for this leftist commando raid on the rule of law.

For Trump. the court system by 2023 had by default become the last refuge in a crisis that had burst through the traditionally defined and universally understood boundaries of Article I, Article II, and Article III of the U.S. Constitution. There were eight issues that had to be examined in order to sift through the miasma of Democrat party lawfare. What is unique is the fact that any one of these eight issues offered an independent basis for determining the outcome of USA v. Trump. The eight issues can be analyzed as follows.

I. EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

In Judge Aileen Cannon’s September 5, 2022 decision in the Trump Mar-a-Lago search warrant case, Judge Cannon cited SCOTUS’s decision in Trump v. Thompson (See Part III), citing 142 S.Ct. 680, 688 (2022). SCOTUS’s July 1, 2024 immunity decision verified Judge Cannon’s suspicion that Trump has at least some level of presidential immunity protecting his conduct that Joe Biden could not waive.

II. THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT

In Armstrong v. Executive Office of the President, 1 F. 3d 1274, 1291 (1993), the term “federal

[MtnClimber]

Part of the two-tiered justice system issue.

[nagant]

In reality, how will these wrongs be righted when the courts are the final arbiters? It doesn’t matter if every action taken by Biden’s DOJ is illegal if they are all upheld by the courts. We need laws which automatically place prosecutors in prison for filing charges which are later found to be malicious.