To: Loyalist
Some entertainer is considered a more significant historical figure than Karl Marx?
To: Verginius Rufus
The other guy did a lot less damage to the world than the lowly Karl Marx.
3 posted on
12/18/2024 12:26:27 PM PST by
reasonisfaith
(What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
To: Verginius Rufus
If the tree falls on George Michael’s grave, and nobody hears it, will it still go “Wham!” ?
5 posted on
12/18/2024 12:31:32 PM PST by
Tell It Right
(1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
To: Verginius Rufus
Not more significant ... in the final analysis no more significant ... or perchance “without significance” is better....
8 posted on
12/18/2024 12:32:49 PM PST by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher )
To: All
It’s impossible to have respect or reverence for Karl Marx if you’re not mind controlled.
9 posted on
12/18/2024 12:35:14 PM PST by
reasonisfaith
(What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
To: Verginius Rufus
“...Some entertainer is considered a more significant historical figure than Karl Marx...?”
Indeed.
Love him or hate him, Marx is considered the third-most influential man, who ever lived, after Jesus and Muhammad.
26 posted on
12/18/2024 2:22:44 PM PST by
Kriggerel
("All great truths are hard and bitter, but lies... are sweeter than wild honey" (Ragnar Redbeard))
To: Verginius Rufus
Marx was a bigger POS though. His body ought to be dug up, put through a woodchipper, and tossed down the sewer for the misery he brought to untold millions with his toxic ideology.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson