Both autopsies are available online and neither one says what you say.
You’re wrong, you’re a liar, or you’re both.
Have a good day.
Second one is utter lies and garbage. It was bought and paid for by a greedy family smelling money.
It should not be given any consideration at all.
The First autopsy said his level of fentanyl was way over the fatal dosage.
Kneeling on a neck *WILL NOT KILL* someone. We've had Freepers conduct this test themselves, and they didn't die from having someone kneeling on their neck.
*THEREFORE*, the claim that Chauvin killed him is a lie, and is only believed by stupid ignorant people who want to believe it, and who are incapable of grasping the truth of the matter. Primarily because they don't want to understand the truth.
They *WANT* Chauvin to be guilty, so they have to believe he killed Floyd, despite what the evidence shows to the contrary.
It's like the OJ Simpson Jury. They want a certain outcome, so they just ignore the evidence.
The second autopsy was conducted by Dr Michael Baden. He was a very high profile forensic pathologist, as can be seen from the Wikipedia article on him, but there is also a lot of criticism of him in that article.
That article points out that, when he conducted his autopsy on Floyd, the evidence available to him “did not include a toxicology report or unspecified bodily samples”. I can’t remember where I saw it, but I have seen a claim that he did not have Floyd’s heart, or at least not the diseased portions thereof, which would be a very serious omission, and means that we cannot have any confidence in his conclusion that “Floyd had no underlying medical problem that contributed to his death.” That is just not true.
In a fortunate coincidence, I happen to have a statement Dr Baden made on “Larry King Live” on August 5, 2002 when discussing the Samantha Runnion kidnapping and murder: “When the passions of the community and the district attorney and the prosecutor are so raised in a case, one can get a false verdict.” So true in the Floyd case.
And he gave an example (this is still from Larry King Live):
“We had another case outside Chicago some years ago. A little girl, Nekariko (ph), was forcibly abducted from her home, brought to the woods, raped and murdered. And two people were falsely convicted, were on death row for something like 13, 14 years. And it turned out because of the community passions that police, prosecutors and forensic scientists got caught up in, and gave false results. It turned out clearly they were innocent, they were released. DNA proved somebody else was the perpetrator who has never been arrested for it, as I understand. And I think that there is a real danger in these most heinous of cases for mistakes to be made. And we have to calm our passions, as horrible as this crime is.”
And Larry King then gave an example of his own: “We have the famed Pittsley (ph) case in Florida. They were on death row for many years for a crime they did not commit based on overzealousness.”
Baden’s example was the Jeanine Nicarico case in 1983, and Larry King’s example was the Pitts and Lee case in 1963.