Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pontiac

You had discussed the storage of nuclear waste with me earlier.

I had no idea that FedGov was now PAYING for extended storage because of failure to build a national storage site.

This sounds like a typical FedGov boondoggle, all the way around. As usual, the taxpayer, and in this case, rate payer is picking up the tab. I also don’t even want to think, with train wrecks like Ohio, how this waste was going to be shipped to a national repository.

I can’t help but notice that “too cheap to meter” isn’t even mentioned any more, either.


3 posted on 12/01/2024 9:17:55 AM PST by Empire_of_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Empire_of_Liberty
I can’t help but notice that “too cheap to meter” isn’t even mentioned any more, either.

It should not surprise you that "Too Cheap to Meter" was uttered by a political appointee. The chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission.

Too Cheap to Meter: A History of the Phrase

People in the industry were unhappy with the statement from the beginning. They called it Overly Optimistic.

People who produce things for sale have a better understanding of the economics of the real world than politicians.

24 posted on 12/01/2024 10:36:09 AM PST by Pontiac (esse welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson