Posted on 11/14/2024 4:19:25 PM PST by nickcarraway
The truth is out there. Or is it? More than 20 reports of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) — “UFOs,” in layman’s terms — made over the past year have stumped the Defense Department and “merit further analysis,” according to the UAP program’s annual report released Thursday.
Between May 1, 2023, and June 1, the Pentagon’s “all-domain anomaly resolution office” (AARO) received 757 reports of sightings — 485 of which referenced new sightings over that period while the remainder occurred between 2021 and 2022.
Among those are 21 reports that AARO director Jon Kosloski said warrant additional investigation — and some which he described as “true anomalies.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
You may have to download this to read all of it:
https://www.scribd.com/document/367908749/som1-01-special-operations-manual-pdf
You said there was crash retrieval material. Where are the photographs of that? Where is this retrieval material being held today?
You are asking about top secret special access information.
Get the clearances and then we can talk.
:-)
There is none. Just documents from 1954 that are cited over and over. Show me proof other than blurry photos and shaky video.
The burden of proof is highly debatable.
.Gov has been running a psychological operations program on this subject for eighty years.
Perhaps you have been a victim of it.
Immaculate Constellation explained
Journalist revels this project to Congress under oath, which was Black. Even Congress did not know about it.
Details encounters with military personnel in a huge data base. Journalist provided fairly extensive 11 page documentation. Cites specific encounters between military personnel and UAPs.
Encounters suggest that the tech is not ours, not Russian, not Chinese and exceeds all known realistic capability.
Congress Releases Shocking UFO Documents! Immaculate Constellation Analysis! 27 min
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Q7drHyBcoQ
I know a con when I see it. The same videos. The same narrative based on nothing but speculation. This amounts to "I want to believe" even when no proof is given.
Most of the 'new' and 'shocking' video looks like amateur cgi. Nothing in the narration presents proof, only speculation.
I like the video of the floating Dorito.
The key is the legacy programs that date back to the 1940s.
The current stuff is the shiny objects to keep you confused.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.