Yes. I have long thought Musk is one of the three non-military who made posts as part of the Q team. Star Link became active in 2019 as a subsidiary of Space X and may have been used by the team to help them communicate securely with both us and each other. The elites and three letter agencies were probably working around the clock to shut down Q’s back channel to the world. It really did ruin everything for them because it caused a mass awakening.
YMMV:
Since Musk is a public figure I doubt he is part of Q because all the nefarious groups such as the CIA and military have all the data on him and his companies, especially SpaceX and Star Link, and have financed much of Musk’s SpaceX.
In 2002 Musk launched Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) with the support of Michael Griffin, then president and chief operating officer of CIA investment firm In-Q-Tel. But by 2008 Musk was flat broke. Despite considerable taxpayer-funded investments, SpaceX was bankrupt.
Luckily for Musk, Griffin was by then the Administrator for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). In December 2008, NASA awarded Musk a $3 billion space station resupply contract. SpaceX hadn’t yet successfully launched a single rocket,
Musk and Griffin’s relationship goes back many years. In early 2002 he met entrepreneur Elon Musk and accompanied him on a trip to Russia, where they attempted to purchase ICBMs. The unsuccessful trip is credited as directly leading to the formation of SpaceX. Musk offered Griffin the title of chief engineer at the company, but Griffin instead became president and COO of In-Q-Tel, a private enterprise funded by the CIA to identify and invest in companies developing cutting-edge technologies that serve national security interests.
Griffin was also the Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering from 2/19/2018 to 7/10/2020 under Trump.
In 2008 Griffin was the Administrative Director for NASA and SpaceX having, at that time, never had a successful rocket launch was awarded contract under the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program, ultimately injecting $396 million into the company as it developed the Dragon spacecraft and Falcon 9 rocket—a significantly more powerful successor to the Falcon 1, with nine first-stage engines rather than one.
“Mike Griffin, the [NASA] administrator at the time who really conceived of the COTS program, at one point characterized it as a gamble,.....
https://archive.is/YOLrO#selection-4845.157-4853.136
Musk’s Star Link is and has been providing internet and communication links to Ukraine since the start of the Russian incursion despite Musk’s claims to the contrary.
After Russia launched its invasion, Ukrainian officials pleaded for Elon Musk’s SpaceX to dispatch their Starlink terminals to the region to boost Internet access. “Starlink service is now active in Ukraine. More terminals en route,” Musk replied to broad online fanfare.
Since then, the company has cast the actions in part as a charitable gesture. “I’m proud that we were able to provide the terminals to folks in Ukraine,” SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell said at a public event last month, later telling CNBC, “I don’t think the U.S. has given us any money to give terminals to the Ukraine.”
But according to documents obtained by The Technology 202, the U.S. federal government is in fact paying millions of dollars for a significant portion of the equipment and for the transportation costs to get it to Ukraine.
On Tuesday, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) announced it has purchased more than 1,330 terminals from SpaceX to send to Ukraine, while the company donated nearly 3,670 terminals and the Internet service itself.
While the agency initially called it a “private sector donation valued at roughly $10 million,” it did not specify how much it is contributing for the equipment or for the cost of transportation.
Sometime after the announcement, the agency removed key details from its release. It now states that USAID “has delivered 5,000 Starlink Terminals” to Ukraine “through a public-private partnership” with SpaceX but does not specify the quantity nor value of the donations.
USAID agreed to purchase closer to 1,500 standard Starlink terminals for $1,500 apiece and to pay an additional $800,000 for transportation costs, documents show, adding up to over $3 million in taxpayer dollars paid to SpaceX for the equipment sent to Ukraine.
In a letter to SpaceX last month outlining the deal, the USAID mission director to Ukraine said the terminals would be “procured” and sent on behalf of USAID by a third-party contractor, which would “arrange for transportation and delivery of the equipment” from Los Angeles International Airport to Ukraine via Poland.
.....The revelations show that while SpaceX appears to have donated a significant sum to Ukraine’s cause, it has done so with public assistance.
The United States and other countries have paid to send much of the known equipment to Ukraine.
https://archive.is/fK9m7#selection-831.0-837.96
Musk IMO is, if anything, a good information source on the opposition for Trump, but since his wealth and companies depend on continual meals at the taxpayer trough I think he is doing what any CEO of his companies would do, keep his client, government, happy regardless of who is in power.
Plus Musk is:
Musk is the grandson of a leader of the original Technocracy movement.
Musk is a transhumanist who wants to insert computer chips in our brains so we can physically merge with machines and thereby eradicate the human race.
Musk promotes Universal Basic Income (UBI), carbon taxes, mRNA vaccine technology and pretty much every other globalist ambition and objective.
Musk is a big fan of super apps—which he calls “everything apps”—like China’s WeChat and Ukraine’s Diia. Not surprisingly, he’s making moves to turn his X platform into an “everything app,” thus enabling fellow Paypal mafia partners like Peter Thiel to use X in their efforts to consolidate control of online digital finance.
And despite his claims Musk still censors and shadow bans on X.
Now one to watch or inquire about would be Griffin, who has a career intertwined with the CIA, NASA and defense research. He has worked under many administrations starting with Bush and ending with Trump, so would have connections throughout the ‘deep state’ and is virtually unknown to the public, unlike Musk.
There is a photo of Musk and President Trump in the Oval Office during his first term. And subsequently Musk posted a photo of his bedside stand, upon which is the famous photo of George Washington crossing the Delaware (posted at least once in a Q drop), and the marks of a ring left by a mug, in the shape of a Q. Maybe someone can find, I have no idea how to search for it. The idea that Musk is some bad guy or outlier is a blind dark alley.
Did a search on Musk on Q drops.
212
Nov 23, 2017 12:27:53 AM EST
Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 66o6MRSe No. 150565108
Nov 23, 2017 12:19:48 AM EST
Anonymous ID: G9U7adoa No. 150564270
>>150563756
Holy shit. All of the president’s past tweets making that reference.
Refernece to SpaceX shortly before.
“MUSK. You magnificent bastard, Q read your BOOK!”
>>150564270
Do you believe in coincidences?
Q