Posted on 10/03/2024 5:47:51 PM PDT by qaz123
So-called “policy experts” at the libertarian Cato Institute, known for its defense of open borders, are admitting that Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) is correct when he says “immigration increases housing prices” for Americans.
“We don’t want to blame immigrants for higher housing prices….
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
They, for darned sure, won’t blame Wall St, Hedge Funds, and private equity from building huge, Build To Rent, developments forcing folks to rent instead of buy.
There’s already one in my county. Another on the way.
Rumor is that the newest one is going to “foreigners”. If true, that’s NGOs and Biden renting the whole place out.
But remember…..Don’t DISS Wall St, Blackrock, Vanguard, State St, etc etc etc. For they and the WEF order that you will own nothing and like it
Nu uh! Tampontimmy and kowmala said that’s just trumpoganda. 🤔👍
Everyone living alone, gay or straight needs to take in a lover and share the same bed. Market forces will solve the problem. Plus they’ll be a whole lot happier!
I have a graduate degree in economics and think it weird that even libtrads can’t understand that if you increase demand without an increase in supply prices will go up. Think I learned that on the first day of an Economics 101 course. If not before.
Interesting… I don’t watch their shows or the Sunday “hey everybody I’m in Congress and I’m smart” shows. But I’ve seen clips of some of them via FB or Instagram reels.
It is impossible to see and listen to any of them that has a scintilla of brains. It’s amazing how dumb they are. And they dominate education and judiciary.
On a side note, private equity around 20k single family homes. Purchased and turned into rentals
“libtrads can’t understand that if you increase demand without an increase in supply prices will go up.
Think I learned that on the first day of an Economics 101 course. If not before.
“libtards can’t understand that if you increase demand without an increase in supply prices will go up. Think I learned that on the first day of an Economics 101 course. If not before.”
Good business schools will stress what you posted above, everyday in every class/subject.
It’s really not that hard, nor does it take statistical evidence to prove. It’s basic econ 101. Demand increases with an increase in population. Duh. Supply is slow to respond because it takes time to build houses. Duh. Increased regulations make it more difficult to increase supply, and therefore, more costly to increase it. Duh.
It’s also the production possibilities curve. There is only so much stuff in a nation to produce goods or services. It’s guns or butter. Sandwiches or pizza. When less people work in a nation, there is less produced, and less that goes around.
Flipping flood a nation with 30 million people, many of whom aren’t working, and there is less stuff to go around. Add in a retiring population of baby boomers, and an unproductive millennial and gen z work force, less stuff is produced.
High school seniors [should] learn it. Mediocre college students due. Why is it that somehow these harvard morons don’t know?
*do. I got so peeved I forgot to spell check!
Its called supply and demand determines the price. Capitalism at its best.
The Harvard Morons are controlled by the Harvard Alums that run Wall St and DC.
Det Carter, aka Chris Tucker, solves the riddle in under 60 seconds.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7gp9QE3prHs
Prices are sky high because supply is low, because Wall St cornered the market and are forcing people to rent. Force them to liquidate, supply grows, prices come down.
Now, toss in 10s of millions, bills paid by us, competing with places to live.
THE WILDEST IDEA is “USING FEDERAL PARKS TO BUILD MORE HOUSES.
RANCHERS & FARMERS & OTHERS HAVE BEEN DISPLACED FOR A VERY LONG TIME TO “CREATE” THESE FEDERAL LANDS & PARKS.
THIS WILL NOT SIT WELL WITH MOST AMERICANS.
I know a number of single persons.
NONE would support your idea.
It shouldn’t sit well with every American. But….
Land deals and permit approvals will be made behind closed doors and America will be told that there’s nothing they can do about it.
At the same time, they drive down wages for the lowest earning jobs.
I think the corporate ownership and attempts at destroying neighborhoods are certainly problematic, BUT, it is just like how things were in the turn-of-the-century. A huge influx of immigrants into our country, without the ability to quickly build housing resulted in horrid living conditions for those immigrants and poor Americans.
But the reality is, we can’t solve all the world’s problems. And bringing people from the 3rd world, who don’t respect our freedoms, social norms, and laws, in addition to the heightened demand for housing, AND low availability, will cause extreme havoc on our culture and way of life.
These people need to stay in their own country and improve their own country if they want to live in better conditions. Making our lives worse doesn’t fix any of these issues.
Those who work do . . . and certain businesses love it because the public is subsidizing their artificially low wages with Section 8 housing, EBT benefits and the like.
**I know a number of single persons.
NONE would support your idea.**
If the SHTF in any way they might have to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.