Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
“They is” is a remarkable construction, for which further grammaticifcation should be offered. The contraction as found in old B/W Westerns, “they’s.” The antonym, “I are.” Used in a sentence: I're sure they's guilty on and off of all charges, according to the "I' of the beholder..."
243 posted on 10/03/2024 1:59:54 PM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]


To: Worldtraveler once upon a time
“They is” is a remarkable construction, for which further grammaticifcation should be offered. The contraction as found in old B/W Westerns, “they’s.” The antonym, “I are.” Used in a sentence: I're sure they's guilty on and off of all charges, according to the "I' of the beholder..."

One of the topics I often find interesting is the evolution of the English language. "Rob's Words" on youtube often offers a fascinating history of it, and this is exactly the sort of topic that he would do a video about if the idea would only occur to him.

But one of the things i've learned about it is that usage eventually sets the rules, and over time "they's" might be considered correct English. :)

256 posted on 10/03/2024 6:12:00 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson