Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 10/01/2024 Vol.500, Q Day 2558

CANCER PROTOCOL USING IVERMECTIN, FENBENDAZOLE

I really appreciated the article about the cancer protocol linked below (which was linked to a good article Jane Long Posted) because it first covered what each vitamin, and supplement in addition to Ivermectin actually did, and then proproposed a protocol.
I hope he can get a doctor onboard, but if it were me, I used the protocol on my own if necessary. Vitamin C by IV may be hard to come by for those who DIY, but I don’t think you need a prescription, and don't require a hospital - there are 'Infusion Centers' for those who just need IV treatments. But without a prescription, then you pay for it out of pocket. There is evidence C works against cancer (just in general) so maybe he could get a prescription. SO the protocol which I’ll post below is Ivermectin plussupplements - nicely detailed.
Here's the link: https://isom.ca/article/targeting-the-mitochondrial-stem-cell-connection-in-cancer-treatment-a-hybrid-orthomolecular-protocol/
Below is Jane's post, and the excerpt from the article detailing the protocol-.

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Dr.Sabine Hazan exposes COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines killed all the bifidobacteria in mRNA jabbed doctors, newborns, etc. (NOTES on 7 min Video excerpt), Jane Long wrote:
FYI ... not sure if you've seen this...

New Cancer Treatment Protocol Featuring ‘Horse Dewormer’ Ivermectin, ‘Dog Dewormer’ Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole Passes Peer Review, Marking Potential Breakthrough in Therapy
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/10/new-cancer-treatment-protocol-featuring-horse-dewormer-ivermectin/
Proposed Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol
Based on our review of the scientific literature, the following protocol combining orthomolecules, drugs and additional therapies for targeting the MSCC in cancer treatment is proposed:
Intravenous Vitamin C
Intermediate- and high-grade cancers: Dose of 1.5g/kg/day, 2-3x per week (Fan, et al., 2023).
Established as a non-toxic dose for cancer patients (Wang, F., et al., 2019).
.
Oral Vitamin D
All cancer grades: Dose of 50,000 IU/day for patients with a blood level ≤ 30ng/mL; 25,000 IU/day for levels 30-60ng/mL; and 5000 IU/day for levels 60-80ng/mL.
Established as a non-toxic dose (Cannon, et al., 2016; Ghanaati, et al., 2020; McCullough, et al., 2019).
It is necessary to reach a blood level of 80 ng/mL of vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamine D (25(OH) D) (Kennel, et al., 2010; Mohr, et al., 2014; Mohr, et al., 2015). This level is non-toxic (Holick, et al., 2011). Once this level is reached it must be maintained with a reduced daily dosage of ≈ 2000 IU/day (Ekwaru, et al., 2014). The vitamin D blood concentration should be measured every two weeks for high doses and monthly for lower doses.
.
Zinc
All cancer grades: Dose of 1 mg/kg/day is established as a non-toxic dose for cancer patients (Hoppe, et al., 2021; Lin, et al., 2006). The reference range for serum zinc concentration is 80 to 120 μg/dL (Mashhadi, et al., 2016; Yokokawa, et al., 2020). Once this level is reached it must be maintained with a reduced daily dosage of 5mg/day (Li, et al., 2022). The zinc blood concentration should be measured monthly.
.
Ivermectin
Low-grade cancers: Dose of 0.5mg/kg, 3x per week (Guzzo, et al., 2002).
Intermediate-grade cancers: Dose of 1mg/kg, 3x per week (Guzzo, et al., 2002).
High-grade cancers: Dose from 1 mg/kg/day (de Castro, et al., 2020) to 2 mg/kg/day (Guzzo, et al., 2002).
All these doses have been established as tolerable for humans (Guzzo, et al., 2002).
.
Benzimidazoles and DON
Low-grade cancers: Mebendazole: Dose of 200 mg/day (Dobrosotskaya, et al., 2011).
Intermediate-grade cancers: Mebendazole: Dose of 400 mg/day (Chai, et al., 2021).
High-grade cancers: Mebendazole dose of 1,500 mg/day (Son, et al., 2020) or Fenbendazole 1,000 mg 3x per week (Chiang, et al., 2021).
All these doses have been established as tolerable for humans (Chai, et al., 2021; Chiang, et al., 2021; Son, et al., 2020). Benzimidazoles can be replaced or combined with DON, administered without toxicity; intravenously or intramuscularly: 0.2 to 0.6 mg/kg once daily; or orally: 0.2 to 1.1 mg/kg once daily (Lemberg, et al., 2018; Rais, et al., 2022). Benzimidazoles are much easier to obtain than DON. However, for metastatic cancers, which rely heavily on glutamine (Seyfried, et al., 2020), a combination of DON and Benzimidazoles should be considered (Mukherjee, et al., 2023).
.
Dietary Interventions
All cancer grades: Ketogenic diet (low carbohydrate-high fat diet, 900 to 1500 kcal/day) (Weber, et al., 2020).
Ketone metabolic therapy consists of approximately 60-80% fat, 15-25% protein and 5-10% fibrous carbohydrates. Adequate hydration and single-ingredient whole food ketogenic meals are necessary to achieve a glucose ketone index (GKI) score of 2.0 or below (Meidenbauer, et al., 2015; Seyfried, Shivane, et al., 2021). GKI should be measured 2–3 hours postprandial, twice a day if possible (Meidenbauer, et al., 2015; Seyfried, Shivane, et al., 2021).
Intermediate- and high-grade cancers: The ketogenic diet should be coupled with a water fast for 3 to 7 consecutive days in advanced cancers (Phillips, et al., 2022; Arora, et al., 2023). The water fast should be repeated several times (≈ every 3-4 weeks) throughout the treatment (Nencioni, et al., 2018), but fasting needs to be undertaken cautiously in individuals using certain drugs and those with < 20 BMI, to prevent loss of lean body mass. For patients who can not fast, the Fasting-Mimicking Diet (300 to 1,100 kcal/day of broths, soups, juices, nut bars, and herbal teas) can be used (Nencioni, et al., 2018).
.
Additional Therapeutics
All cancer grades: Moderate physical activity, 3x per week. Increased heart and respiratory rate for a period of 45 to 75 minutes (Bull, et al., 2020) with activities such as cycling, running, swimming, etc.
Intermediate- and high-grade cancers or individuals who are unable to engage in physical activity: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, 1.5 to 2.5 ATA for 45 to 60 minutes 2-3x per week (Gonzalez, et al., 2018; Poff, et al., 2015).
The protocol should be followed for an average duration of 12 weeks, regardless of cancer type. The analysis of the interactions between each of the molecules revealed no contraindications to the combination of these substances (ANSM, 2023; CRAT, 2024; Lemberg, et al., 2018; Vidal, 2024). The treatment dosage and duration can be adjusted by the physician according to the individual patient, their ability to obtain the various molecules, and the treatment results. Adaptation of the protocol to include additional molecules to restore health, could be considered by the physician. These may include: vitamin K2 (Xv, et al., 2018), vitamin E (Abraham, et al., 2019), coenzyme Q10 (Liaghat, et al., 2024), methylene blue (da Veiga Moreira, et al., 2024), niacinamide (Yousef, et al., 2022), riboflavin (Suwannasom, et al., 2020), Artemisinin + 5-aminolevulinic acid (to cause porphyrin accumulation) (Adapa, et al., 2024), melatonin (Mocayar, et al., 2020), NADH (Medjdoub, et al., 2016), and magnesium (Ashique, et al., 2023), as examples. However, antioxidant dosages should be avoided.
This additive and synergistic effect of this combination of orthomolecules, drugs, and additional therapies targets the MSCC by increasing OxPhos activity in healthy mitochondria, offering protective action for these cells. However, in cancer cells, both CSCs and non-CSCs, the pro-oxidant effect of the combination induces apoptosis. Additionally, this protocol specifically targets fermentable fuels, CSCs and macrophages, and thus metastases. In brief, the key points of the MSCC. Therefore, comparative studies need to be conducted in both animals and humans to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this hybrid protocol against standard therapies.

ransomnote: The following is part of the autogenerated YOUTUBE transcript for the video of Patrick Bet-David and Mike Benz, posted to FR here, "breaking down the shocking measures allegedly considered by establishment elites to influence the 2024 election. From internet censorship to counterinsurgency tactics, Benz unveils the strategic playbook of those aiming to control the American political landscape." A Freeper already posted the video to FR, but I am posting Part 1 of the transcript.

Since the transcript is auto-generated by a computer, it can make mistakes and omits punctuation, but it's usually sufficient to understand the content. However, I couldn't follow this one because there are two different people speaking, and there's no indication when one stops speaking and the other begins. So I began listening to the video and making corrections to the transcript, and added names to indicate which man was speaking.

I only corrected the first half of the transcript before the election actually happened. I've gone back to the transcript because it's packed with information, and it's still informative in that it details what the Deep State will try to do both before and after the election to prevent Trump from taking office. Part of my interest is in reading what Trump/Q/Mil have stopped from occurring, and of course, what lies ahead for them to interupt.

The key missing element I really have been expecting is street riots.
Here's an excerpt about the Deep State's 'missing' capacity for street riots from Part 1 of the Transcript:

Mike Benz: ...it's worth noting that recently Rosa
Brooks published, I believe in The
Guardian, that one of the things they
currently lack right now is this same
public protest power that they had in
2020. They sort of lamented that they
don't have the same capacity right now
to leverage off of that they had in 2020
about this street destabilization
I think Q's references to 'mapping' Antifa explains why the riots are 'missing' now.

Q4366,

Q referred to 'mapping' Antifa 5 times, I posted the first instance above. They are largely repetitive, but drop Q4385 contains descriptive text repeated in the remaining three drops Q4385, Q4732, and Q4766. Benz was also expecting these riots. Ah, but Q/Trump/Mil are so unpredictable.
ransomnote: The following is PART 1 of the autogenerated YOUTUBE Transcript which I corrected, for the video of "Patrick Bet-David and Mike Benz, posted to FR here.

PART 1 TRANSCRIPT BEGINS~~~

Patrick Bet-David:
Right off the bat I want to go into this
one here. So let's just say you get a
phone call from the establishment left
and establishment right elites.They call
you. Mike, um we need your help. We have 13
days left of election in the
states. November 5th is around the corner,
we've tried defamation of character
didn't work; we've tried using the doj, he
didn't drop out.
We've tried assassination attempt; he
looked right and we missed him. We've
tried humiliating him in front of his
family, and they're still united. We've
tried humiliating him in front of his
wife; his wife is still right next to him.
We've tried pitting his voters against
him, and they're even more loyal to him.
We've tried impeaching him, it got his
people more loyal to him. We've tried
arresting this guy, and doing a mug shot
thinking that was it, because he'd be the
first one; he used it against us, and his
popularity went higher. We try to
deplete his savings with all the losses
that we put together; he's still there.
We've tried every single thing that
we've done, okay?
We used the pandemic as a way to shut
down everything in a creative way,
whatever, let's just say they didn't you
know what what happened in 2020, that
worked however we can't use that now. We
need you to think like Dr Evil, if you're
able to to figure out a solution for us.
Again, being a devil's advocate here, you
have a get out of jail card for the rest
of your life, okay? Let's just say they're
going to offer that to you; obviously, for
you it wouldn't work anyway. I'm just saying
play that part, to think how the opponent or the
enemy would, you know, use a way to
prevent him from winning the next 13
days. What creative tools are left that
they haven't used yet?

Mike Benz: Oh, well there's so
many. I mean some of them are on the
censorship side, but I would say at this
point with Elon uh firmly at the helm
of X and with Zuckerberg actually
loosening a lot of the the censorship
techniques, and actually actually firing
a lot of the established back channel
connections that the blob, you know this
sort of DOD/IC/State Department and
financial stakeholder complex that's
against Trump, is uh you know is driving
it, uh with with those options being a
lot less than they were four years ago
uh even though they're trying now
through these International regulations,
like this EU censorship law, and uh
they're planning to do this 140
countries now it's it's insane but sort
of a side story.
I actually think the the
most direct threat, the thing that they
are planning to do is is easiest to
understand through the lens of an
organization called the Transition
Integrity Project (TIP), which was uh which was
set up by this this individual who was a
former high-ranking Pentagon official
with a CIA blue badge uh who organized
exactly what you talked about. The former
head of the the DNC, Donna Brazil, yeah
that's the one.
If you if you run
a search on my X handle for TIP I
can walk you through the the actual
screenshot showing this absolutely
diabolical uh plan that they that they
had for 2020 and that they've already
War gamed for 2024, but if you maybe if
you put in BLM you'll you'll it'll pull
up some of these
screenshots. Maybe if you refresh or
something sometimes it takes a minutes
to uh uh yeah. So let's see if you scroll
down, if you scroll down you'll
see, uh okay so well that's that's one of the
the screenshots right here, where, so in
this simulation they had Donna Brazil,
the former head of the DNC, part of your
scenario, and Michael Steele the never-
Trump, former head of the GOP, who are
both a part of this war game and you'll
see who personally roleplayed Joe Biden
in this 2020 election coup, simulated war
game was none other than John
Podesta, the Hillary the Hillary Clinton
campaign manager who was then promoted
to run the largest slush fund in the
entire federal government of the Biden
White House, in charge of $375 billion in
climate funds, personally role playing
Joe Biden.

So if you uh if if you keep
scrolling actually I'm going to show you
exactly what I'm talking about, and this
is I think, going to be shocking to a lot
of people. If you haven't seen this
before uh but scroll down. Okay so that's
the thread right there. So if you, so and
there's a whole, you know, thread
around this, but if you just click that
image I'll just show you what what
this is.

So here's here's what happened
in June 2020, just just about a week
after the uh George Floyd protest broke
out in Minneapolis. A gaggle of high-ranking
military, CIA, State Department and
political insiders all met in in
Washington in order to wargame a
scenario in which Trump lost the
election, but clung to power.

So they contemplated the need
for a way to overthrow his government if,
to basically do a counter coup, in case
he did a coup, if he clung to power, if he
used the military, if he just didn't
respect the election results. And they
run, they ran four simulations around
this.
One of these was called a
Clear Biden win; the second one
was Too Close To Tell,
but the third one was called Clear Trump
Win, and they War gamed how to get Trump
out of office even if he legitimately
won the Electoral College. And make no
mistake, this entire thing was 100%
never-Trump. The the appendix at the back of it
was called, How To Stop Trumpism After
Trump, meaning even after they defeated
Trump, how do you eliminate Trumpism from
the GOP. Now here's how diabolical this
plan was in 2020.

So 13 times in the
17-page document, they call for
a need to uh to take to the streets, to
control perceptions of public legitimacy,
to censor the internet uh so that
perceptions of a Joe Biden illegitimate
presidency would be minimized.

At the time, they were already contemplating
that the only way Joe Biden could win
would be through what they called the
red Mirage blue shift, that Trump would
win on Election night, but it would be a
red Mirage because it would shift blue
as mail and ballots were counted and
States would flip and they knew that
this was going to cause havoc in the
minds of Americans, because nothing like
this had ever happened, where you have
multiple States flipping overnight. Uh,
people popping champagne the night
before and then waking up and finding
actually their opponent is President.

So they wanted to pre-censor public
perceptions that Joe Biden's victory would be illegitimate.
So what they did is they had this plan to wrangle the legacy media,
the broadcast media, to the Social Media companies -that this network
would descend on all the Social Media
companies to get every single one of them
to pass a new 'Terms of Service' violation
called "delegitimization" which meant if
you if you posted on Twitter, or Facebook,
or YouTube, or Reddit, or Twitch, anywhere
on of the major 15 platforms
that they targeted, that you didn't
believe that mail-in ballots were safe
and reliable, you had a problem with
early voting dropboxes, you had a problem
with electronic voting machines or voter
tabulation issues, that that would be a
'Terms of Service' violation, and either
your post would get flagged you get
deboosted in the algorithm, your account
could get suspended.

Remove/reduce inform is
what they call this, basically ban uh you
know, deboost and then you know,
factchecking interstitials that limit
the virality.

Patrick Bet-David: Remove/reduce, what was the
last one?

Mike Benz: Remove/reduce inform. Right.
Those are basically the levels of how
hard the banhammer you get hit with.

And what they did is they got a direct
partnership, this is one of the groups
that was operating sort of parallel to
TIP, was a group called EIP, the Election
Integrity Partnership.

They had a formal
partnership with the Department of
Homeland Security, and they targeted tens
of millions of tweets, they said you know
2.5 million or something for Stop The
Steal. Uh, they they bragged on tape about
setting up the tech platforms to be
able to take stuff down quickly. They did
an autopsy....

Patrick Bet-David: Who bragged on tape? When you say they, who
were they?

Mike Benz: The Election Integrity Partnership,
it was it was a Consortium of four
different um outside entities, because....

Patrick Bet-David:
What was the biggest name? Who was the biggest
name in that recording?

Mike Benz: Well, the you know, the
technical lead was the Stanford internet
Observatory who just got its plug pulled
by Stanford after all these scandals. But
the most significant was the Atlantic
Council of these four. The Atlantic
Council has seven CIA directors
currently serving on its board of
directors, current former, number-one
heads of the CIA, seven of them, all on
the board of this one. It's it's NATO's
think tank, is how it effectively bills
itself. It gets annual funding, over a
million dollars a year from the Pentagon,
over a million dollars a year from the
State Department, plus money from a web
of CIA cutouts, like the National Endowment
for Democracy it is basically a military
intelligence back-channnel for NATO to be able to
coordinate civilian-side changes to
laws, and uh and society

So another one of those four Partners was a
group called Graphica,which has gotten
over $7 million in Pentagon funding.
It was incubated in the Pentagon's
Minerva Initiative, which is the
psychological operations Research Center.
So there's a literal Pentagon psyops firm,
uh and previously this same network had
done all these training sessions to
hundreds of journalists about how to
flag Trump tweets. Uh, if he just held up,
if he when he tweeted Witch Hunt about
Russia Gate, they would train journalists
in different predicates for how to argue
it should be censored on social media.

But what they called for in this
simulation was, 'if Trump were to win fair
and square, we can still use this coup
power, even if he doesn't, so it's not
a counter coup to stop a coup, we'll just
do it to coup him out of office, and we'll
do it in the following way: We will make
the argument that the Constitutional
base of the Electoral College is
illegitimate.'
And by the way, you're
already seeing that again this year. If
you if folks remember the spate of
headlines that you've seen recently in
the news, the New York Times calling to
torch the Constitution, the Washington
Post saying the Constitution is the
biggest threat to democracy, the dean of
Berkeley law school coming out and
saying we need you know we need to end
the Electoral College. This is priming;
this is setting you up for the argument
that they're going to make if Trump wins
fair and square on November 5th.

Now what they did is, they said simultaneous with
this legal argument that we are going to
uh argue that the popular vote should
determine the election instead of the
electoral vote, we're going to
destabilize the country and and inflict
so much pain on people's day-to-day life,
so much pain on the governance of the
system, that people are going to clamor
effectively for the easy way out, which
is going which is going to be this
popular vote method.

And they had a
few ways that they, that this war
game went through doing that. Some of
them involved State secession. California,
Oregon and Washington would effectively
secede; they would not
respect the federal government, uh the
the the typical federalism relationship
between states and governments. So you
would have the governors come out and
effectively suceed; they would form this
Alliance.

Uh you would have, and very
importantly and significantly
on screen here you're seeing 'a show of
numbers in in the streets and actions in
the streets may be decisive factors in
determining what the public perceives as
a just and legitimate outcome.'

So again, this is right after the BLM Riot
breakout.

Patrick Bet-David: Who wrote this by the way?

Mike Benz: This was the Transition Integrity Project.
This was Rosa Brooks's, you know, she's
she's currently at Georgetown law, but
she was, you know she was I think Under
Secretary of Defense or Assistant
Secretary. She was a high level Obama
Pentagon official with a CIA blue badge,
according to her own book.

Um and what
what you'll see here if you, if you go
back and just look at these receipts (ransomnote: repeated image)
Because it's it's so damning, what they
say is that they would Leverage the
destabilization power of racial justice
activists, and they just assumed that in
this war game, BLM and Antifa, the
Sunrise movements would all
respond to a call, a "Biden call to
take to the streets." So they presupposed
that they would do that, but they said, 'we
did not robustly test this' so in the
next 5 months we need to capacity build
them.
And this is on another page here,
but again, this is all on my timeline, and
what they say is we need to build strong
ties with these organizations, and then
later they say we need to fund them, we
need to Resource them so that they will
be "responsive to the movement's
demands" and be responsive to a Biden
call to take to the streets.

And so this
paramilitary street muscle is part
and parcel of every intelligence
operation that involves a ground-up,
people-powered overthrow of a government.
There's two ways that you can overthrow
a government.

You can do a top-down,
military coup from the generals, and by
the way Rosa Brooks in January 2017, the
first month of being in office, wrote
an oped where she said three ways to get
rid of Trump before before the 2024
election,. This is before Trump's first
week had even transpired. Three ways to
get rid of him before the 2024 election,
but buried at the bottom of this was a
fourth way, which she called for, was a
military coup, which she
acknowledged had never been done in our
country's history, and would be a black
mark on our on our country's
legacy, but it might be necessary to stop
Trump. That we might need a top-down,
military coup, coming from a high-ranking
military official from the previous
administration.

But what they call for is
the street paramilitary presence to take
over Federal buildings, to block streets,
to block highways, to get the unions
involved, and so the whole country would
ground to a halt. And people would call,
would clamor for the different
government, in the same way that happens
in every CIA coup when you are
economically destabilizing the country,
when you are surrounding their
Parliament building with
protesters, and when you are making the
people hungry and desperate so they will
agree to a new government different than
the one they elected.

Patrick Bet-David: This is documented? This is
public. It's not like they're...

Mike Benz: Yes.

Patrick Bet-David: It's not like they're
shameless about it.
Mike Benz: Yes.

Patrick Bet-David: They're not even,
something that they're hiding from...

Mike Benz: They were fundraising off of
it!

Patrick Bet-David: Okay, so this is the Tweet, if you can
go to it, Rob, from the top, because what
we just showed was number 17, part of....
Zoom in a little bit. So this is the
thread you put up together. What other
part of this do you want to show that
shows what else they asked about?

Mike Benz: Well there's one if you if you go to, um, I
mean there's so much here. But and, and
it's worth noting that recently Rosa
Brooks published, I believe in The
Guardian, that one of the things they
currently lack right now is this same
public protest power that they had in
2020. They sort of lamented that they
don't have the same capacity right now
to leverage off of that they had in 2020
about this street destabilization
capacity.

Patrick Bet-David: Okay, let me, let me let me go
back to the question, all right? So the
question is, if you were hired by The
Establishment elites on the left and the
right to find the way in the next 13, 14
days to prevent him from winning in all
the ways they've tried it with the DOJ,
humiliation, defamation of character, you
know Stormy Daniels. taking away money,
depleting cash, all that stuff hasn't
worked what would be the way for you to
get it done? One you said through this.

Okay, now let me give my rebuttal to it.
[ransomnote: I stopped correcting the computer generated transcript here 15:08]
~~ PART 1 TRANSCRIPT ENDS
THIS TRANSCRIPT POST IS ON AN OLD, UNRELATED THREAD. Remember to go back to the original link.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.