Youngkin's Election Reform Failure

American Thinker ^ | 30 Sep, 2024 | Thomas Kasperek

[MtnClimber]

Recently, Virginia's governor Glenn Youngkin signed Executive Order 35 ("EO 35") "to protect the casting of legal ballots by legally eligible voters in Virginia's elections, including stringent ballot security, complete and thorough counting machine testing, and best-in-the-nation voter list maintenance." Nationally, the mainstream media portrayed EO 35 as a bold step to improve Virginia's election integrity before the 2024 General elections.

On the contrary, citizens investigating Virginia's broken electronic voting systems know otherwise. We have discovered uncertified, unsecured electronic voting equipment and massively inflated voter rolls. Both issues also lead to the likelihood of absentee mail-in ballot fraud, not ballot security. Volunteers had to work outside the Republican political establishment to expose the current problems, notwithstanding the claims of EO 35. Virginia citizens have found the governor and the attorney general's office to be uninterested in looking into claims of election integrity issues statewide. To the citizens engaged in thousands of hours of election integrity work, the EO 35 is more like lip service.

Some Downstream Consequences from the Lack of Election Integrity in Virginia:

Voter Registration Lists

Virginia's Registered Voter List (RVL) is grossly inflated -- the consequence is likely inaccurate and unsecure results in 2024 unless corrective action is taken immediately. The Voter History List (VHL) must have extra votes, too, because some of the inflated 'extra' voters have voted in the last four elections. In a recent pre-litigation letter filed against ELECT and Commissioner Susan Beals, the Virginia-based law firm of Holtzman Vogel cited that 101 of 133 counties/cities have registrations that exceed 90% of their respective eligible populations. Of those, 43 counties/cities have impossibly high ratios of registered voters -- at greater than 100%. The U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey reports that registration rates historically have been in the mid-70% range.

---

TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: electionfraud

[MtnClimber]

Based on this and other corroborating data, we estimate that more than 1,000,000 extra registrations exist on the rolls

JUST IN VIRGINIA.

[GailA]

If it can be hacked in seconds, time to go back to 1 standarized ballot. No hanging chads.

[maddog55]

Years of failure is typical for government which is always late to do anything, then throws money at a problem that’s scammed by corrupt people.

Accountability is non existent and the simplest fix and you definitely don’t need new laws.enforce the laws on the books and fire those who fail at their jobs.

[Recompennation]

I ‘ve been telling y’all that Virginia wrote the book on the STEAL.
Now it is deployed to steal federal elections too.
How do you like that, pocket voters,

[Zathras]

Actually, voting can be fully computerized with modern systems.
The current voting system goes back to when we used punch card programs back in the 60’s.
The world does billions of banking transactions everyday.
It can easily handle 300M in 1 week.

[rlmorel]

I saw this section:

---

"...In September 2024, ELECT announced that voter registrants' birthdates would now only include the two-digit birth year. Again, the EO 35 feels more like lip service. While the governor's proclamation appears to enforce election security and accuracy, through ELECT, he effectively weakens the ability of citizens to monitor the security and accuracy of the voter registration database. That ability is a civil right afforded by the National Voter Registration Act of 1993. While it doesn't appear significant, the decision to simplify the birthdate undermines the accuracy of voter registration data. This degradation in the quality of the voter data inhibits election integrity groups from identifying invalid registration IDs and minimizes the ability to challenge them..."

---

If I read this correctly, they won't include the full DOB any more-and only include the last two digits of the year they were born. So, instead of "03/07/1996", they will only store "96". I thought "Why would they do that?"

Back in 1980, if you were designing a database, you might do that because storage was expensive. Now? What rationale could they have?

I suspect this is because there is possibly an API (Application Programming Interface) that can be accessed by programs that use AI to check voter rolls against a variety of other databases, and including only two digits would cause a failure, because those other programs would be unable to match a DOB, and therefore, not flag it as a possible duplicate voter registration.

What do you think? (I am predisposed it is just one more way for Leftists to commit election fraud)

[MtnClimber]

It sounds like the only reason they would reduce DOB to two digits.

[Texas Fossil]

Thomas Kasperek (the author of the article)

Loudoun Couple Charged in Jan. 6 Riot at Capitol (Mar 29, 2024)

https://www.loudounnow.com/news/loudoun-couple-charged-in-jan-6-riot-at-capitol/article_c9a453c6-ee07-11ee-930a-837f5562245d.html

Does the FIB have them over a barrel?

The FBI has charged two Loudoun residents who were photographed among the mob that broke into the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to impede the certification of the presidential election.

Thomas and Daphne Kasperek were arrested Thursday following a federal raid on their Lowes Island home.

[JimRed]

... to impede the certification of the presidential election.

to impede correct the certification of the fraudulently decided presidential election.