Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

I respect your opinion on this, ansel12, but to me, this has nothing to do with, no parallel with Clinton and Lewinsky, so I would agree that is not a worthwhile approach.

Lewinsky was just a pawn being taken advantage of by a powerful man, she wasn’t interested in getting into higher office. She was the political equivalent of a groupie. A sad affair, IMO. But she was a grown woman, and should have known the waters she was wading into.

I see Harris quite differently in this context. She absolutely knew the waters she was wading into.


85 posted on 09/27/2024 4:49:32 PM PDT by rlmorel ("A people that elect corrupt politicians are not victims...but accomplices." George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

Remember what matters, do the republican men help win female votes by focusing on this, or does it turn off female voters for republican men to keep harping on this, or is it a draw and mean that republican men are wasting valuable time on it when there are better appeals to the female voter, which still makes it a negative.

I don’t see much chance of this being a winning thing to keep harping on.


87 posted on 09/27/2024 4:55:56 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson