Posted on 09/23/2024 10:44:09 PM PDT by blueplum
Prince Harry's visa documents will not be made public, a judge has ruled in a major victory for the Duke of Sussex. In a court decision handed down on Monday, US District Judge Carl Nichols said the British royal had a 'reasonable privacy interest' in relation to his US immigration paperwork and therefore such files should remain private.... The decision comes after Judge Nichols spent five months reviewing Harry's immigration file as part of a case brought by the Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank based in Washington, D.C... The judge said that some documents submitted to him by DHS were 'of particular relevance' but the sentence was followed by a large paragraph that is redacted. Another large section of 'particularly relevant' information was also redacted....
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I think I see the poblem: “court fillings” (2 “L”s in there)
So the courts are dentists, and that explains the bad teeth plus many other difficulties that burden modern British ways and means.
Supreme Court Rules 9–0 Federal Judges Cannot Second-Guess Visa Revocations
Warning: Love those guys, but NSFW language at the link.
See post 5.
There is a double standard at work here.
Privacy?
https://people.com/prince-harry-named-time-100-lcimate-list-work-travalyst-8743607
Let him eat bugs.
He is our enemy.
He should be given no quarter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.