[Texas Fossil]

AI does not think. Computers are good at memory.

Humans are intuitive and have can analyze things better.

[cgbg]

“Humans are intuitive and have can analyze things better.”

We have no idea what intuition is.

Given that it is kinda hard to say that AI won’t be able to do it.

:-)

[cgbg]

Just one other comment on human analytical skills.

Humans have a lot of trouble with analysis of huge and complex data sets.

We just get overwhelmed.

Those are where AI can be very valuable.

—
Just a silly example.

Q. Do people with brown eyes have higher IQs than people with blue eyes?

We are looking at eight billion people and hard to find data on their eye color and IQ.

Presumably AI could find the data from bits and pieces on the web and then crunch some numbers.

[unlearner]

“AI does not think. Computers are good at memory. Humans are intuitive and have can analyze things better.”

AI would not have made your “have can” grammatical error.

You are quite wrong about AI. It can and does already think and analyze things better than humans.

AI is on a very short trajectory to outsmart humans at almost anything based on thinking, logic, and analysis.

I think you may be right in distinguishing humans from AI in the area of intuition.

It does not appear to have the ability feel.