> What you neglect to mention or do not understand it is the date of the notarization that validates the affidavit <
The document that I saw had the notary’s name blacked out. In such a case, the date means nothing. With no notary’s name, we don’t know if the document was even properly notarized.
If someone (maybe Speaker Johnson) can produce an unredacted document, that would be huge.
My complaint is not with the allegation. I’d bet my retirement account that there was collusion. My complaint is with the whistleblower not hitting hard and fast.
I dunno. Maybe there is a strategic reason for these half-measures. But my fear is that the public will lose interest as time goes on.
Well we do have the witness of Black Insurrectionist, the poster on X who’s working with the whistleblower and breaking all of this online. Presumably he’s seen the original unredacted documents.