Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux

A friend of mine taught me an old analytical trick to figure out puzzles where you are evaluating complex information.

He argues that you need to focus on who is not talking instead of who is talking.

In this case, for example, we have had no whistleblowers from the Department of Energy. There would be key players there involved in researching new energy technology (”free energy” in the lore).

The lore suggests they have been running a “Murder inc.” to either recruit, intimidate or eliminate scientists who are on the path to invent exotic energy sources that would revolutionize the world economy.

Vallee has provided excellent documentation of their involvement in the Trinity crash of 1945—and Sheehan has argued that the Atomic Energy Act of 1946 is a critical part of the “legal” basis for the “program”.


103 posted on 09/15/2024 5:07:47 AM PDT by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: cgbg
Yes. Good point. The DOE hasn't said a word...yet.

And of course the USAF has always been mum.;-)

But thank God for the Navy. Particularly Rear Adm. Tim Gallaudet (Ret.)

104 posted on 09/15/2024 5:17:26 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (Thinking objectively is difficult. And painful. That’s why many people just cling to their biases.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson