Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Rev M. Bresciani; Williams

What is obvious .... she is not running for the American people or on her own ‘accomplishments’ ... the case she was making was personally against Trump. Things that you more easily think of with 20-20 hindsight could have been said - in the heat of battle, Trump was fending off a 3 on 1 attack. Trump still has ads, rallys, etc. to discuss Harris’s lack of decorum, no original policies or plans. He did smartly bring up that she has been VP for 3.5 years ... why hasn’t she attempted/done what she is promising now as ‘future’ behavior? The Best Predictor of Future Behavior Is … Past Behavior. One thing that was perfectly clear without Trump saying a word ... Harris’s behavior during the not-a-debate aka gang mugging was juvenile rather than presidential (facial expressions, eye rolling, chin on hand, laughing AT Trump while he was talking, etc.). She looked & acted ridiculous & not serious.


4 posted on 09/12/2024 8:13:43 AM PDT by Qiviut (Forced obedience to obvious lies is the essence of totalitarianism-the ultimate flex for psychopaths)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Qiviut

If Harris was a male candidate, her ridiculously facial expressions would be a big post debate topic.

She outdid Gore in that category.

As far as the two clowns running interference for Harris.
I’m surprised they didn’t have Pelosi standing behind Trump “ripping up paper” for 90 minutes.


8 posted on 09/12/2024 10:29:37 AM PDT by unclebankster (Globalism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson