[Petrosius]

It is not “shallow” to oppose billions of our tax dollars going unaudited to a known money-laundering operation. It represents fiscal responsibility and therefore, conservatism.

Then make that argument; don't mock those who disagree with you. I, for one, disagree with your assumed premise that the aid to Ukraine is a money-laundering operation. If so, where did the Ukrainians get the resources to appose the number two military in the world for the last 2 1/2 years? Obviously the aid has gone to good use. To me it seems that your position is just a rationalization to allow Russia to subjugate Ukraine without any opposition.

[Allegra]

Then make that argument; don't mock those who disagree with you.

Don’t tell me how to post. I mock those who pollute this forum with excessive spam and those who repeatedly and predictably make false accusations against Americans here. I’ve said that at last twice in my last few posts. Try to pay attention.

To me it seems that your position is just a rationalization to allow Russia to subjugate Ukraine without any opposition.

This is the epitome of why I can’t take most of you zeepers seriously. You have pre-determined, with no evidence whatsoever, that I have some allegiance to Russia. You zeepers all do this. Why bother trying to discuss anything rationally with you when you spew idiocy like that? That nonsense is why you are mocked.

Get it now?

[UMCRevMom@aol.com]

“Then make that argument; don’t mock those who disagree with you. I, for one, disagree with your assumed premise that the aid to Ukraine is a money-laundering operation. If so, where did the Ukrainians get the resources to appose the number two military in the world for the last 2 1/2 years?

Obviously the aid has gone to good use. To me it seems that your position is just a rationalization to allow Russia to subjugate Ukraine without any opposition.’

Thank you. I totally appreciate your comment.