Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

If he was, he was a highly educated fraud and a lot of archeologists still use him for reference. He may not have been right on some things but on many things he was and still is. Aside from that he was not the only one who speculated about the 3600 year cycle, as Immanuel Velikovsky also made a pretty well documented case for it. But to each his own as we are still entitled to our own opinions. Take care and have a great day!


54 posted on 09/02/2024 11:20:24 AM PDT by Saintgermain ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Saintgermain

There are zero archaeologists who take Sitchin’s BS seriously.

The orbital characteristics he claimed for his fictional planet don’t work in Newtonian/Keplerian terms, which isn’t surprising, because they’re entirely made up.

Velikovsky didn’t have anything to do with any 3600 year cycle. Sitchin once claimed that Worlds In Collision came out about the same time as his own monstrosity, but of course it was published more than 25 years earlier.

These are facts, not opinions.


55 posted on 09/02/2024 11:27:06 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson