“Specifically, the form is meant to comply with A.R.S. 15-113, which gives parents “the right to review learning materials and activities in advance” and the right to withdraw their student from the activity or “request an alternative assignment” if the parent objects and finds the activity or material “is harmful.”
The law defines “harmful” as having to do with “sexual content, violent content or profane or vulgar language.” It’s unclear how concepts like integers or ratios might qualify.”
Strange interpretation of the law. It’s obviously on purpose to try to ridicule the law.
““Lewis said. Teachers really deserve the trust of parents.””
They should look in the mirror to see who destroyed that trust.
“Strange interpretation of the law. It’s obviously on purpose to try to ridicule the law.”
Not ridicule. The purpose is to make the law of no effect, because parents will receive so many of these notices that they will begin ignoring them altogether. It’s “malicious compliance”:
“Malicious compliance (also known as malicious obedience) is the behavior of strictly following the orders of a superior despite knowing that compliance with the orders will have an unintended or negative result. It usually implies following an order in such a way that ignores or otherwise undermines the order’s intent, but follows it to the letter.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_compliance
Sounds like a step in the right direction, at first. Then when you go in to “discuss options,” one of them is probably a probe from CPS.