Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Z28.310

“”””Historically, there was no requirement to obtain a marriage license in colonial America. When you read the laws of the colonies and then the states, you see only two requirements for marriage. First, you had to obtain your parents permission to marry, and second, you had to post public notice of the marriage 5-15 days before the ceremony.””””

Look at my posts, marriage licenses were common and legal notice of some sort was required, in other words compliance with the law.

Muslims couldn’t just silently use their Quran to prove their many wives qualified for legal marriage status.


82 posted on 08/26/2024 12:09:47 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

“...marriage licenses were common and legal notice...”

“Common” is not the same as “required”
And posting “public notice” is not a license.

A marriage license is today “common”, but not a legal requirement for Biblical marriage, nor found in the Bible. A marriage has nothing to do with a state or government license.

There currently are Spiritual unions and even legal contracts drawn between two parties in the secular world, but no license is required for those either.

You quoted part of the article, but left out what Ohio law says. A man and woman don’t need to and are not required to sign a contact with a state, as a third party to their marriage. A family Bible with notations is completely legal and lawfully recognized and it need not be inspected, or approved by the state.

You also left out the part that marriage licenses came to be to permit blacks to marry whites as this had been illegal and you needed permission from the government to do so.

We don’t need permission from uncle sugar to marry.

No fault divorce removed all remedy for damages for violating a marriage and renders the implied contact to be unenforceable. No reason, or requirement to involve the state in this matter, because the state will only make dissolution (God forbid that this happens, but it does happen VERY often) of the marriage more costly, time consuming and painful.

Last, you’re going off on another trail completely with the “muslims” comment, which is also irrelevant, off topic and a distraction.


84 posted on 08/26/2024 1:09:58 PM PDT by Z28.310 (does not comply well with others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson