You mean women can be vicious?
I have no idea if he is factually innocent are not, but the defendants would only have to prove the affirmative defense that their statements were true by the preponderance of the evidence, not the beyond a reasonable doubt standard that applied at the criminal trial. The “not guilty” finding should not even be admissible in the civil trial, because it is not a finding of innocence , but rather that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
The accused photo isn’t the best but I detect crazy eyes.
Article:
“She added that her language “was over-zealous and unnecessarily forceful.” She also directly addressed the use of the word “rape,” saying it was used “without qualification that it was an allegation…”
Thanks for the admission—now time to apologize with a big cash settlement.
bump